I would choose both. AI couldn’t have happened without human intelligence.
The long list of benefits of AI has been well publicised now, and one of these benefits is that AI is helping to save lives in hospitals and in the community.
Like anything else, it’s about using it correctly to benefit the world.
I think I've watched to much Dr Who to feel comfortable with AI robots doing surgery on me, I think back to the cybermen from the David Tennant era of Dr Who.
AI is only as clever as the material it's given to learn from, there have already been instances of bias, racial bias in particular, there's probably a gender bias too.
Where does Ai leave those iof us who want to engage in ideas and expand our thinking? That's something not based around facts alone, but the interpretation of themm context is so important and I'm not sure AI can know the contexts of exploratory thinking, is it only "thinking" inside it's box, can it make meaningful connections across subjects?
But people have all the same biases. They learn from the same sources people do
There is no reason it can't make the same, and most likely better, connections, as it can draw from a bigger pool of knowledge. Although this is more applicable to technical topics.
The challenge is when they learn from each other.
I think they probably have issues with spiritual, ethical or emotional topics as they are unlikely to be able 'feel' anything. This means they are all potential psychopaths.
