• Replies 80 replies
  • Subscribers 39 subscribers
  • Views 2600 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Gaza

TheCatWoman

Trump has announced that he thinks all Paletstinians should be moved from Gaza and into neighbouring countries where they can live in nice new modern homes, America will take over Gaza and turn it into a massive resort and it will create lots of jobs and money.

Why should the Palestinians have to give up thier country?

Where would they go? Both Egypt and Jordan have said they can't/won't accept them and why should they, they both have the same pressure with migration the rest of the world has.

Does America intend to fund all these new homes etc and where would they be?

Who would staff all these hotels etc in this new resort?

Where would they live?

Who will profit from this enterprise

Any move to displace the Palestinians would break at least two international treaties, so will Trump be forced to take any notice of the treaties the US has made previously, or does he just intend to ignore them?

Does anyone else think this is a totally stupid idea?

Parents

  • Dear members of the Community,

    I would like to remind you of Rule 7: Be respectful in discussions, when discussing these topics. Disagreements are fine, but personal attacks and insults are not. Swearing is not allowed. Please respect other viewpoints and avoid taking sides in arguments. Comments can be misinterpreted, and posts may come from users who are anxious or distressed. If something upsets you, take a break before responding. 

    Many thanks,

    ChloeMod

  • in reply to Chloe Mod

    Did I miss something? I've been impressed by how polite and tactful people have been with any disagreements in this thread. What's the problem?

Reply Children
  • in reply to Mark
    Mark said:
    What's the problem?

    The absence of certain agent provocateurs helps but overall we have not had anyone giving a wildly biassed opinion so we are able to debate the facts as we can ascrertain them.

    Where there are disagreement over facts we can use references to get to the bottom of it and move on.

    It is all terribly civilised. Unlike what is happening to both side in the dispute.