• Replies 9 replies
  • Subscribers 39 subscribers
  • Views 230 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Mental chronometry

firemonkey

An #autistic interest.

Via Copilot-

Mental chronometry is the study of the time it takes for the brain to perform cognitive tasks. This field involves measuring reaction times to understand the speed and efficiency of mental processes. By analyzing how quickly someone can respond to various stimuli, researchers gain insights into perception, decision-making, and motor responses.

The connection between mental chronometry and intelligence lies in the idea that quicker cognitive processing often indicates higher intellectual ability. Here are a few key points:

  1. Reaction Time: Faster reaction times are generally associated with higher intelligence scores. Individuals who can process information more quickly tend to perform better on intelligence tests.

  2. Processing Speed: Mental chronometry measures how fast the brain processes information. Those with faster processing speeds usually show better problem-solving skills and quicker learning abilities.

  3. Cognitive Efficiency: Efficient mental processes, as indicated by quicker reaction times, can reflect a more efficient brain, which is often linked to higher intelligence.

  4. Research Studies: Numerous studies have found significant correlations between mental chronometry measures (like reaction time tasks) and general intelligence (often measured by IQ tests).

Overall, mental chronometry provides a valuable tool for understanding the relationship between the speed of cognitive processes and intelligence. While it's just one aspect of intelligence, it offers meaningful insights into how efficiently our brains function.

  • A good day cognition wise. Being the cognitively erratic person that I am I'll probably do a lot worse tomorrow.

    iq-tests-for-the-high-range.com/.../slobrain.html

  • in reply to firemonkey

    I'm not a place putter. Not my style.

  • in reply to SpikeyMark
    SpikeyMark said:
    and lower verbal ability their IQ is 'hidden'.

    There's a rather large group   that dismisses verbal ability as a measure of intelligence.

  • in reply to SpikeyMark

    I knew what you were saying. I just didn't know if its aim as a  response was to put me in my place.

  • in reply to TheCatWoman

     With mental chronometry  there's far less chance of me thinking 'I only did well at that,because almost anyone could do well at that'.  Or 'I must be stupid,because I got that wrong' There is no 'right or wrong' to such a test (sloBRAIN) .

  • in reply to firemonkey

    I'm trying to say, but failing, that I think that besides the people with obvious high IQs, there are also some people who are actually intelligent but due to slower sensory processing times and lower verbal ability their IQ is 'hidden'.

    Think a top of the range Samsung S25 Ultra (coming this year!) but with a very cracked screen and dodgy touch screen sensors. The processor is still as powerful and can do the same great things.

  • in reply to firemonkey

    I think it's not the number's involved in the measuring, as I've said I've met some people with very high IQ scores, who dont' know how to apply they're intelligence, so are they, who can barely boil an egg or be let out on their own, better off than someone like me who has a reasonable adjusted score and a terrible unadjusted one, who uses all of her intelligence?

    I guess whether slow and deep thinking or fast and shallow are better depend on what you're thinking about? I always think of people who think fast and shallow as missing a lot of important stuff, more prone to be judgemental and unkind, whereas slow but deep thinkers are more likely to be able, after a period of thinking time, to give very detailed answers with many points and perspectives considered. But then maybe I would think that, being a fairly slow and deep thinker myself.

  • in reply to SpikeyMark

    Within the high IQ community there is some discussion re 'slow but deep' thinkers vs 'quicker but more shallow'  thinkers. I honestly don't know how to take your response to my post, and indeed the two thumbs up for it.

  • I've come to think recently that there is a lot more to intelligence than is commonly thought.

    I don't even mean the polite "there are all different types of intelligence"

    If you will bear with me for a bit

    Back in 1983 during the home computer boom, after the ZX-81 and ZX-Spectrum, Sinclair released the Sinclair QL

    Way ahead of the times when processors were 8-bit, it boasted a 32-bit processor.

    However, it still only had an 8-bit buss (input/output)

    Recently I have come to know that there are people like this who inside their minds can do all sorts of fancy 32 bit things, but they can only get the data slowly and talk about it slowly (8-bit). But on the chip (in their brain) there is just as rich a world of thinking that your normal high intelligence people have. But to the outside world they won't always appear as such.