How autistic and non-autistic people can understand each other better

"Autistic people often experience difficulties with social communication. It’s so common, in fact, that it’s one of the central criteria for an autism diagnosis.

For as long as we have been diagnosing autism, doctors and researchers have regarded social communication difficulties as autistic “impairments”. But in more recent years, research has begun to show that – just like autistic people have been saying for a long time – communication breakdowns go both ways.

In other words, neurotypical people can have just as much difficulty understanding autistic people as the other way round. This is now sometimes referred to as “the double empathy problem”.

In my new book, Understanding Others in a Neurodiverse World, I draw on linguistics, the study of language, to look at the double empathy problem a little more closely. And I consider how autistic and non-autistic people can better communicate with each other."

theconversation.com/how-autistic-and-non-autistic-people-can-understand-each-other-better-234320

Parents
  • neurotypical people can have just as much difficulty understanding autistic people as the other way round.

    The author mentions autists then switch to a label of neurotypical - asuming this was not intentional (my experience with ADHD and bipolar people has shown they do not have the same level of social issues as autists) then the subject of the book is effectively expecting the 98% of the population who are non-autistic to adapt to the 2% who are.

    To put it in context, if there were a group of 100 people there would, on average, be 2 autists in there. Each one would most likely struggle to comminicate with the group in the same way of the others and would probably also struggle to communicate with the other autist.

    Even reducing this to 50 people per autist, is it fair to expect all 49 of them to make adaptations because of the 1 autist?

    I'm not suggesting that they should do nothing, just highlighting the scale of the situation we find ourselves in.

    How would you redress the balance? Would you even want to?

    Just trying to get the discussion going

Reply
  • neurotypical people can have just as much difficulty understanding autistic people as the other way round.

    The author mentions autists then switch to a label of neurotypical - asuming this was not intentional (my experience with ADHD and bipolar people has shown they do not have the same level of social issues as autists) then the subject of the book is effectively expecting the 98% of the population who are non-autistic to adapt to the 2% who are.

    To put it in context, if there were a group of 100 people there would, on average, be 2 autists in there. Each one would most likely struggle to comminicate with the group in the same way of the others and would probably also struggle to communicate with the other autist.

    Even reducing this to 50 people per autist, is it fair to expect all 49 of them to make adaptations because of the 1 autist?

    I'm not suggesting that they should do nothing, just highlighting the scale of the situation we find ourselves in.

    How would you redress the balance? Would you even want to?

    Just trying to get the discussion going

Children