• Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 28 subscribers
  • Views 2285 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Welfare Reform - out of control?

longman

I've been trying to find out how the DWP measures the impact of changes to the welfare system, particularly with regard to disability - what they term "equality impact assessment".

I've had two replies to this. One is from the DWP Ministerial Correspondence Unit: 

"it is nearly impossible to measure the impact of such a wide range of reforms and changes, particularly as they are not in place fully, and case loads are dynamic"

The second is from the Minister for Disabled People - Mike Penning M.P. Seems he is briefed by his team....

"It is nearly impossible to measure the impact of such a wide range of reforms and changes, particularly as they are not in place fully, and caseloads are dynamic. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has also said that it would be nearly impossible to do a cumulative impact assessment".

But he does say also:

Reforming the benefit system aims to make it fairer, more affordable and better able to tackle poverty, worklessness and welfare dependency. We have tried to make fair choices and to protect those who are most in need and have looked closely at the impact of decisions on different groups, including disabled people"

Very commendable if these assurances mean anything, but if they are unable to measure the impact, how do they know they have protected those most in need?

Wheeeee... aren't we having a wonderful time scrapping the welfare state, the national health service, state education........  Never mind that we haven't a clue whether we're doing any damage. we're having a whale of a time being a Government again......

Tough if you're recently homeless as a result of the welfare reforms, as is the case for one of the correspondents in this forum .........

Parents

  • Come on..... this isn't a government that thinks. A previous Government formed of Conservatives targeted single mums as the root of all Britain's problems. Another tried to make out that moral decline was a big issue, until it emerged that they were guilty of some of the worst immorality.

    I'm not being party political when I say this (I'm not fond of any politicians). But it is a singular characteristic of conservatives that they look to blame .... to find a scapegoat, to divert attention from their incompetent handling.

    This attack on increased DLA claimants is just a scapegoating exercise. It is clear from paragraph 5 in the Equality Impact Assessment that they see DLA claimants as a potential scapegoat for the high numbers claiming benefit. And that explains the naive objective to cut claimants by a round number 500,000.

    Whether consciously or unconciously, they do seem to have targeted autism this time. And they really are THAT short-sighted. I do jest about "public school boys" but this time around it is an apt allusion. This current Government is made up largely of immature public school boys.

Reply

  • Come on..... this isn't a government that thinks. A previous Government formed of Conservatives targeted single mums as the root of all Britain's problems. Another tried to make out that moral decline was a big issue, until it emerged that they were guilty of some of the worst immorality.

    I'm not being party political when I say this (I'm not fond of any politicians). But it is a singular characteristic of conservatives that they look to blame .... to find a scapegoat, to divert attention from their incompetent handling.

    This attack on increased DLA claimants is just a scapegoating exercise. It is clear from paragraph 5 in the Equality Impact Assessment that they see DLA claimants as a potential scapegoat for the high numbers claiming benefit. And that explains the naive objective to cut claimants by a round number 500,000.

    Whether consciously or unconciously, they do seem to have targeted autism this time. And they really are THAT short-sighted. I do jest about "public school boys" but this time around it is an apt allusion. This current Government is made up largely of immature public school boys.

Children
No Data