The quest for truth seems quite normal for most of us. I wouldn't call it a disability, but I would call the system of education somewhat disabling - if that makes sense.
What I've found is, as a professional, I've hired other individuals to discuss things I might be reasoning through. Many times they will hear concepts and ideas that I assume are quite base as extraordinary. At the same time I might be thinking that another philosopher or psychoanalyst has already expressed this so it's nothing new. So then I somewhat consider I might be more akin to an archeologist or archivist, someone who has simply taken the time to hunt a thing down. Curious, is this what you mean by abstract thinking: https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/abstract-thinking
Personally, I have found visualisation, or Picture-Thinking, is the best for abstract reasoning and leave my hyper-connected mind to it's function. From what I've read, this could come easier to many autistic individuals. But I needed to first sort through Trauma, which created blocks to the natural skills I had, to begin to recognise they were a bit wild and out of sorts (creating havoc instead of being useful). A bit like having nightmares or just randomly feeling assaulted by something unknown and becoming immediately reactionary. That 'unknown' element, won't be recognised until I spend a bit of uninterrupted and focused time learning to engage and discipline my senses. Or learning to engage and discipline my imagination. These are quite powerful tools.
I have difficulty writing and working with language. I triple check most things as I do enjoy well crafted essays or literature. But even writing this. I only started to feel a bit more proficient at written expression by 40 and even when helping my son with Uni, could not help him meet deadlines. Give me a few years for a topic and I might have something!
The quest for truth seems quite normal for most of us. I wouldn't call it a disability, but I would call the system of education somewhat disabling - if that makes sense.
What I've found is, as a professional, I've hired other individuals to discuss things I might be reasoning through. Many times they will hear concepts and ideas that I assume are quite base as extraordinary. At the same time I might be thinking that another philosopher or psychoanalyst has already expressed this so it's nothing new. So then I somewhat consider I might be more akin to an archeologist or archivist, someone who has simply taken the time to hunt a thing down. Curious, is this what you mean by abstract thinking: https://www.goodtherapy.org/blog/psychpedia/abstract-thinking
Personally, I have found visualisation, or Picture-Thinking, is the best for abstract reasoning and leave my hyper-connected mind to it's function. From what I've read, this could come easier to many autistic individuals. But I needed to first sort through Trauma, which created blocks to the natural skills I had, to begin to recognise they were a bit wild and out of sorts (creating havoc instead of being useful). A bit like having nightmares or just randomly feeling assaulted by something unknown and becoming immediately reactionary. That 'unknown' element, won't be recognised until I spend a bit of uninterrupted and focused time learning to engage and discipline my senses. Or learning to engage and discipline my imagination. These are quite powerful tools.
I have difficulty writing and working with language. I triple check most things as I do enjoy well crafted essays or literature. But even writing this. I only started to feel a bit more proficient at written expression by 40 and even when helping my son with Uni, could not help him meet deadlines. Give me a few years for a topic and I might have something!
hyper-connected mind
I think this wording is perfect. Sometimes I feel I do not understand things and then I wonder if it is just because I am already completely overthinking, overanalysing, and overcriticising its every atom..