Is anyone here getting any help from NAS ?

Does anyone here get actually get any help from NAS ?

My experience is you ask for help and they send you a bucketload of PDF'S of other organisations. Am I wrong to have expected more ?

The chief executive gets paid 140 grand a year, is it right that someone can live in luxury on that kind of salary from charitable donations ? Not even counting the other 20 people on stupid salaries comes to over 2 million quid ...no doubt plus expenses.

I thought charities existed to help others but obviously they are more interested in helping themselves.

Parents
  • As this site uses NAS  IT et al, de facto NAS controls this site as any post can be  removed, or a member disallowed.

    The reaction to one sentance amongst my extensive posts, on a possible connection between  autism and vaccines excited so much objection ie three separate individual comments, also may appear to show that NAS's mission is controlling the site.

    The latest from scorpio does not state the research that showed no link between vaccines and autism, and I am sure that anyone reading this site, would be interested in this reseach, so could a link, or details by referance to the web, possibly be provided. The only research I am aware of is that by Wakefield, whose methods were later discredited, but by an establishment who backed, and promoted the vaccines so may be a conflict of interests.

    What surprises me is that my posts raise many other issues in far more detail, yet they have not been commented on, and I cannot understand why investigations into the causes of autism, one of which could be  vaccine related, should raise such interest and derision. If there is no such link then why the concern, that this be clarified and throughly investigated,particularly if large sums have already been paid out by a USA court to an autistic girl by a vaccine manufacturer.

     

       

Reply
  • As this site uses NAS  IT et al, de facto NAS controls this site as any post can be  removed, or a member disallowed.

    The reaction to one sentance amongst my extensive posts, on a possible connection between  autism and vaccines excited so much objection ie three separate individual comments, also may appear to show that NAS's mission is controlling the site.

    The latest from scorpio does not state the research that showed no link between vaccines and autism, and I am sure that anyone reading this site, would be interested in this reseach, so could a link, or details by referance to the web, possibly be provided. The only research I am aware of is that by Wakefield, whose methods were later discredited, but by an establishment who backed, and promoted the vaccines so may be a conflict of interests.

    What surprises me is that my posts raise many other issues in far more detail, yet they have not been commented on, and I cannot understand why investigations into the causes of autism, one of which could be  vaccine related, should raise such interest and derision. If there is no such link then why the concern, that this be clarified and throughly investigated,particularly if large sums have already been paid out by a USA court to an autistic girl by a vaccine manufacturer.

     

       

Children
No Data