Skip to main content
Close Button
Donate
  • Replies 169 replies
  • Subscribers 41 subscribers
  • Views 55257 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Chat Bot

Endymion
over 6 years ago

Am I right to be concerned about the possibility of Chat Bots on this site?

There are a few concerning posts and, as I don't know much about these things, I'm not sure if I'm worrying over nothing here? Can they cause harm to individuals in any way on this type of chat site? 

If I'm being ridiculous, someone please tell me so! (I will be more relieved than offended.)

Parents
  • over 6 years ago

    People they are not a chatbot. A chatbot wouldn't amend their profile. They are also asking people to add friends and private message. A bot would usually not use complex commands on the site interface. Someone would need to code a site specific bot for this. A quite convoluted process.

  • over 5 years ago in reply to Cloudy Mountains

    Note that there is code specific to spam this forum software (Telligent Community), and we've seen it over the past week, and it defeats the anti-spam systems there are. There is code to imitate English responses by picking on key words (Alice is much better than Eliza, and Mitsuku better than Alice, plus they can get human input from elsewhere on the net). People could hack that code together. The aim could be a mass trawl to get personal information.  The Copybot (qv) may have two purposes I can see; (a) create recognised and linked to 'sleeper' profiles that are then used for pharma spam etc; or (b) undermine the general anti-spam systems, by getting Akismet to trust particular IP addresses or patterns, and that could also be an application for a forum chatbot.

    I share your reasoning and conclusion, but not quite your confidence.

Reply
  • over 5 years ago in reply to Cloudy Mountains

    Note that there is code specific to spam this forum software (Telligent Community), and we've seen it over the past week, and it defeats the anti-spam systems there are. There is code to imitate English responses by picking on key words (Alice is much better than Eliza, and Mitsuku better than Alice, plus they can get human input from elsewhere on the net). People could hack that code together. The aim could be a mass trawl to get personal information.  The Copybot (qv) may have two purposes I can see; (a) create recognised and linked to 'sleeper' profiles that are then used for pharma spam etc; or (b) undermine the general anti-spam systems, by getting Akismet to trust particular IP addresses or patterns, and that could also be an application for a forum chatbot.

    I share your reasoning and conclusion, but not quite your confidence.

Children
  • over 5 years ago in reply to Cassandro

    None of the bots have passed the Turing test. Mitsuku and Cleverbot are capable of complex stuff but applying their code would be a very, very, long push to appear as a user who can converse with multiple users. The sheer amount of individual abstraction would be a throw out to any bot. It would take a long time. Those bots are directed towards a specific user usually to tailor a response that is specific to the user. It would need a fair bit of human direction to be any sort of threat to the users. 

    I know that there are spambots but that wasn't my main concern. Spam is a problem. My main concern was an actual human with bad intentions. This is something that is far more nefarious. I saw a few things going on that were targeting a user in particular. I thought that it was a bit strange. Bots don't profile a users personality quickly. BTW I've got to say you are *** hot at noticing spam!