Need some help please

Sorry, but this will be quite a rant to read through. 

Standardising humanity is the biggest and most foolish error past scientists ever made, due to the lack of fluid thinking of nonautistic people they don't realise that what scientists who are looking for cures are actually doing is trying to prevent general human evolution.
What a foolish and flawed belief they all have, that scientists have the ability to prevent human evolution? 

In science we are to apply the same principles to everything, so the principles which apply to us must be applied to everyone. 
So if they're going to continue claiming we're disabled because our brain functioning and development prevent us being able to do certain things, we must apply the same principle to "normal" brains meaning they're disabled because their brain functioning and development prevents them from being able to do things we can do, so they've got brain dysfunctions as well, the difference is their dysfunctions are accommodated for while they ignored our needs when designing the environment.

The average of 6, 12, 7, 15 and 5 is 9. Not one of the original numbers fits the standard, they are basing "correct development" on something with no tangible existence. Since the brain they're referring to doesn't even exist, the imaginary brain they're talking about no one fits meaning no one has developed "correctly", and that their is no such thing as "correct/normal" development.

All the milestones are artificial, man-made expectations, they are not actually real. If there's diversity in brain development we should expect diversity in human development, due to diversity in genetics we should expect diversity in everything about the human condition. Everyone develops at different paces, and there's no scientific formula to determine how far away from the milestones a person must be in order to be called "delayed" meaning there is no such thing as "developmental delay", it should be called "developmental diversity". 

It's also a fallacy to believe "average" is the best.
That's no different to saying "Love, hate, compassion, cruelty, generosity, greed are all pathologically suspect as they are all away from average by the two ideals.
How ideal is the life of someone who denies the ideals of life itself?

Here's just how flawed normality is and how their methodology works;
If the majority of the world had the ability to read music and about 10% didn't, they would define that 10% as dysfunctional, put numerous funding towards finding out what's "wrong" with them. That is precisely what scientists did to gay people less than a century ago, just because it did not align with their nonexistent "normal" brain they automatically labelled them pathologically disabled.
As human evolution continues more minorities will be identified and they will automatically label them pathologically disabled even though they are not, just like gay never was a pathological disorder. That correction was not because of science, it's because as they began focusing more on newer minorities gay people blended in.

Normality is the biggest disability, it's why "normal people" are the least creative, the least radical, the least innovative people on this earth.
Creativity is not "normal," radical thinking is not "normal," innovative thinking is not "normal," they are all outside of the box.
They're so held back by normality and social convention because of their brain functioning, we can say "normal people" have SDD, Social Dependency Disorder.

Molecular biologist Miroslav Radman writes, "Mutagenesis has traditionally been viewed as an unavoidable consequence of imperfections in the process of DNA replication and repair. But if diversity is essential to survival, and if mutagenesis is required to generate such diversity, perhaps mutagenesis has been positively selected for throughout evolution."

Evelyn Fox Keller explains:
"We now know that mechanisms for enduring genetic stability are a product of evolution. Yet a surprising number of mutations in which at least some of these mechanisms are disabled have been found in bacteria living under natural conditions. Why do these mutants persist? Is it possible that they provide some selective advantage to the population as a whole? Might the persistence of some mutator genes in a population enhance the adaptability of that population? Apparently so. New mathematical models of bacterial populations in variable environments confirm that, under such conditions, selection favors the fixation of some mutator alleles and furthermore, that their presence accelerates the pace of evolution."

The mutants behind autism offer some great advantages to the human race, diminishing the genes is a great risk because without those mechanisms there is no asurety of genetic stability pushing us in the direction of extinction. 

"You gotta challenge all assumptions. If you don’t, what is doctrine on day one becomes dogma forever after."

Sorry, but this will be quite a rant to read through. 

Standardising humanity is the biggest and most foolish error past scientists ever made, due to the lack of fluid thinking of nonautistic people they don't realise that what scientists who are looking for cures are actually doing is trying to prevent general human evolution.
What a foolish and flawed belief they all have, that scientists have the ability to prevent human evolution? 

In science we are to apply the same principles to everything, so the principles which apply to us must be applied to everyone. 
So if they're going to continue claiming we're disabled because our brain functioning and development prevent us being able to do certain things, we must apply the same principle to "normal" brains meaning they're disabled because their brain functioning and development prevents them from being able to do things we can do, so they've got brain dysfunctions as well, the difference is their dysfunctions are accommodated for while they ignored our needs when designing the environment.

The average of 6, 12, 7, 15 and 5 is 9. Not one of the original numbers fits the standard, they are basing "correct development" on something with no tangible existence. Since the brain they're referring to doesn't even exist, the imaginary brain they're talking about no one fits meaning no one has developed "correctly", and that their is no such thing as "correct/normal" development.

All the milestones are artificial, man-made expectations, they are not actually real. If there's diversity in brain development we should expect diversity in human development, due to diversity in genetics we should expect diversity in everything about the human condition. Everyone develops at different paces, and there's no scientific formula to determine how far away from the milestones a person must be in order to be called "delayed" meaning there is no such thing as "developmental delay", it should be called "developmental diversity". 

It's also a fallacy to believe "average" is the best.
That's no different to saying "Love, hate, compassion, cruelty, generosity, greed are all pathologically suspect as they are all away from average by the two ideals.
How ideal is the life of someone who denies the ideals of life itself?

Here's just how flawed normality is and how their methodology works;
If the majority of the world had the ability to read music and about 10% didn't, they would define that 10% as dysfunctional, put numerous funding towards finding out what's "wrong" with them. That is precisely what scientists did to gay people less than a century ago, just because it did not align with their nonexistent "normal" brain they automatically labelled them pathologically disabled.
As human evolution continues more minorities will be identified and they will automatically label them pathologically disabled even though they are not, just like gay never was a pathological disorder. That correction was not because of science, it's because as they began focusing more on newer minorities gay people blended in.

Normality is the biggest disability, it's why "normal people" are the least creative, the least radical, the least innovative people on this earth.
Creativity is not "normal," radical thinking is not "normal," innovative thinking is not "normal," they are all outside of the box.
They're so held back by normality and social convention because of their brain functioning, we can say "normal people" have SDD, Social Dependency Disorder.

Molecular biologist Miroslav Radman writes, "Mutagenesis has traditionally been viewed as an unavoidable consequence of imperfections in the process of DNA replication and repair. But if diversity is essential to survival, and if mutagenesis is required to generate such diversity, perhaps mutagenesis has been positively selected for throughout evolution."

Evelyn Fox Keller explains:
"We now know that mechanisms for enduring genetic stability are a product of evolution. Yet a surprising number of mutations in which at least some of these mechanisms are disabled have been found in bacteria living under natural conditions. Why do these mutants persist? Is it possible that they provide some selective advantage to the population as a whole? Might the persistence of some mutator genes in a population enhance the adaptability of that population? Apparently so. New mathematical models of bacterial populations in variable environments confirm that, under such conditions, selection favors the fixation of some mutator alleles and furthermore, that their presence accelerates the pace of evolution."

The mutants behind autism offer some great advantages to the human race, diminishing the genes is a great risk because without those mechanisms there is no asurety of genetic stability pushing us in the direction of extinction. 

"You gotta challenge all assumptions. If you don’t, what is doctrine on day one becomes dogma forever after."