When AS is not "significant impairment"

I would like to introduce a thread that deals with AS/ASD with lesser impairment - when those diagnosed do not strictly meet the requirement of "significant impairment". These are the people with ASD/AS who are able to manage their lives or who have not been successful in claiming support or whose access to support is being challenged under the new constraints.

From other dialogue here, there is clearly some concern amongst those with significant impairment that too many people are being diagnosed who are perceived as not fitting the "significant impairment" criteria.  That includes people who have improved/ "been cured" since original diagnosis.

Some of this may otherwise belong under "Living on the Spectrum", but I feel there are a lot of concerns under diagnosis and assessment that need addressing where people are managing to cope with impairment and have some degree of fulfilment. This includes socialising, relationships, travel, work etc. However the reason I bring this up is that there are maybe significant issues for those who do not meet the "significantly impoaired" criteria that differ from the latter. I don'r feel these get a fair hearing.

If the moderators want to move this to "Living on the Spectrum" fair enough, but can you please do it so that there is an opportunity to discuss issues affecting those with "lesser impairment"

Parents
  • Ah I see. So everyone with "real" aspergers is condemned to dependency.

    I had hoped to create a dialogue for those with lesser impairment to explore more positive solutions.

    I'm not denying the "real" ASDs the rest of the site to play with.

    Like it or not, we exist in an NT run society. The privilege of being able to refuse to cooperate is in your imagination True Colors.

    Where people can demonstrate that disability does prevent them working will I'm sure be able to get support without question, even if it doesn't seem that easy at the moment. 

    I agree I survived because I had particular skills to offer,even though I was constantly being challenged by people who claimed my face didn't fit and I should go. 25 years ago one boss was severely reprimanded for trying to get me sacked on the grounds if he didn't want my skills he should have offered me first to other departments. I spent the next year on the management floor doing competitor analysis.

    So I understand what your saying. I just wish some people would stop trying to run Aspergers like a private kingdom.

    But there has to be a way forwards to make it easier for those less impaired who can. 

Reply
  • Ah I see. So everyone with "real" aspergers is condemned to dependency.

    I had hoped to create a dialogue for those with lesser impairment to explore more positive solutions.

    I'm not denying the "real" ASDs the rest of the site to play with.

    Like it or not, we exist in an NT run society. The privilege of being able to refuse to cooperate is in your imagination True Colors.

    Where people can demonstrate that disability does prevent them working will I'm sure be able to get support without question, even if it doesn't seem that easy at the moment. 

    I agree I survived because I had particular skills to offer,even though I was constantly being challenged by people who claimed my face didn't fit and I should go. 25 years ago one boss was severely reprimanded for trying to get me sacked on the grounds if he didn't want my skills he should have offered me first to other departments. I spent the next year on the management floor doing competitor analysis.

    So I understand what your saying. I just wish some people would stop trying to run Aspergers like a private kingdom.

    But there has to be a way forwards to make it easier for those less impaired who can. 

Children
No Data