When AS is not "significant impairment"

I would like to introduce a thread that deals with AS/ASD with lesser impairment - when those diagnosed do not strictly meet the requirement of "significant impairment". These are the people with ASD/AS who are able to manage their lives or who have not been successful in claiming support or whose access to support is being challenged under the new constraints.

From other dialogue here, there is clearly some concern amongst those with significant impairment that too many people are being diagnosed who are perceived as not fitting the "significant impairment" criteria.  That includes people who have improved/ "been cured" since original diagnosis.

Some of this may otherwise belong under "Living on the Spectrum", but I feel there are a lot of concerns under diagnosis and assessment that need addressing where people are managing to cope with impairment and have some degree of fulfilment. This includes socialising, relationships, travel, work etc. However the reason I bring this up is that there are maybe significant issues for those who do not meet the "significantly impoaired" criteria that differ from the latter. I don'r feel these get a fair hearing.

If the moderators want to move this to "Living on the Spectrum" fair enough, but can you please do it so that there is an opportunity to discuss issues affecting those with "lesser impairment"

Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member

    "Those with "lesser impairment" who have had greater success in gaining employment or have been able to secure continuous or fairly continuous employment, encounter workplace issues."

    The problem is that workplaces are designed for NTs.  Those with AS who can offer a particular skill and who would be difficult - or impossible -  to replace  will be tolerated by their colleagues and accommodated by their employers but those who can easily be replaced by someone who fits into the work environment will be.  That's the reality of the situation.

Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member

    "Those with "lesser impairment" who have had greater success in gaining employment or have been able to secure continuous or fairly continuous employment, encounter workplace issues."

    The problem is that workplaces are designed for NTs.  Those with AS who can offer a particular skill and who would be difficult - or impossible -  to replace  will be tolerated by their colleagues and accommodated by their employers but those who can easily be replaced by someone who fits into the work environment will be.  That's the reality of the situation.

Children
No Data