People who self-diagnose gaining access to services

A major autism organisation is giving access to groups/services for adults with Asperger's and high functioning autism to adults who self-diagnose.

Those who self-diagnose are highly motivated, unlike many adults with autism where motivation can be an issue.  They are more likely to attend groups than those with significant problems. These self-diagnosed adults as service users have a say in how services are run.  In this organisation, they want groups set up that exclude those with Asperger's and high functioning autism who have more problems than they do.

This mirrors what has happened in some online groups for people with Asperger's that have been dominated by those desperately seeking a diagnosis.

What other condition allows those that self-diagnose to be given access to services?  It could be argued that everyone as some autisitic traits i.e. is on the autism spectrum.  But surely the point of diagnosis is to identify those that are in need of support services.  To be given a diagnosis, there must be 'significant impairment'.  Many of those desperate for a diagnosis do not meet the criterea.  For many 'Asperger's Syndrome' seems a trendy diagnosis - it doesn't have the baggage of many conditions linked to the mind/brain.  They have little awarenees of the many difficulties faced by those living with Asperger's/high functioning autism.

I believe allowing people who self-diagnose access to services makes diagnosis meaningless.  In the long term, it is likely to have a negative affect on funding for services for adults.

What are your thoughts?

 

Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member

    It seems logical to assume that among the population who reached adulthood before autism or AS had been recognized a considerable number are on the spectrum.  This is almost never publicly acknowledged because of the cost involved if they all applied for diagnosis and as a result it is extremely difficult to obtain such a diagnosis. as an adult. 

    However, I don't think this should mean self-diagnosis because (as I said in a previous post) it will fuel disbelief among NTs that the condition actually exists. Too often disclosure that one is on the spectrum is met with  disbelief and words to the effect "Well, I'm a bit like that but I've never thought I was autistic."!

    I feel that one problem with late-diagnosed AS is that such people have been forced throughout their life to cope with the problem unaided and that skill at 'covering up' disguises the fact that they have always operated under considerable stress, although to the outside world they've operated successfully in terms of work and relationships,

     

Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member

    It seems logical to assume that among the population who reached adulthood before autism or AS had been recognized a considerable number are on the spectrum.  This is almost never publicly acknowledged because of the cost involved if they all applied for diagnosis and as a result it is extremely difficult to obtain such a diagnosis. as an adult. 

    However, I don't think this should mean self-diagnosis because (as I said in a previous post) it will fuel disbelief among NTs that the condition actually exists. Too often disclosure that one is on the spectrum is met with  disbelief and words to the effect "Well, I'm a bit like that but I've never thought I was autistic."!

    I feel that one problem with late-diagnosed AS is that such people have been forced throughout their life to cope with the problem unaided and that skill at 'covering up' disguises the fact that they have always operated under considerable stress, although to the outside world they've operated successfully in terms of work and relationships,

     

Children
No Data