People who self-diagnose gaining access to services

A major autism organisation is giving access to groups/services for adults with Asperger's and high functioning autism to adults who self-diagnose.

Those who self-diagnose are highly motivated, unlike many adults with autism where motivation can be an issue.  They are more likely to attend groups than those with significant problems. These self-diagnosed adults as service users have a say in how services are run.  In this organisation, they want groups set up that exclude those with Asperger's and high functioning autism who have more problems than they do.

This mirrors what has happened in some online groups for people with Asperger's that have been dominated by those desperately seeking a diagnosis.

What other condition allows those that self-diagnose to be given access to services?  It could be argued that everyone as some autisitic traits i.e. is on the autism spectrum.  But surely the point of diagnosis is to identify those that are in need of support services.  To be given a diagnosis, there must be 'significant impairment'.  Many of those desperate for a diagnosis do not meet the criterea.  For many 'Asperger's Syndrome' seems a trendy diagnosis - it doesn't have the baggage of many conditions linked to the mind/brain.  They have little awarenees of the many difficulties faced by those living with Asperger's/high functioning autism.

I believe allowing people who self-diagnose access to services makes diagnosis meaningless.  In the long term, it is likely to have a negative affect on funding for services for adults.

What are your thoughts?

 

Parents
  • It is weird how new postings timed earlier don't appear when writing. I guess they only refresh when you log out. Hence, while I take your points on board, I just appeared to be adding my last comment at 22.37 to my previous comment at 22.17. So JimV Mod's advice at 22.29 didn't appear there until after and leaves me looking like I'd ignored it.

    I accept the point that people's feelings without evidence are valid, but there really have been a lot of claims in this thread about the validity of private diagnosis and the appearance of over-diagnosis. Some facts would help.

    And can I add that there must be people logging on here who only have self diagnosis, because they cannot get anything better, who cannot feel good faced with the strength of feeling against self diagnosis. If NHS diagnosis was uniformly available UK wide that might be different.

Reply
  • It is weird how new postings timed earlier don't appear when writing. I guess they only refresh when you log out. Hence, while I take your points on board, I just appeared to be adding my last comment at 22.37 to my previous comment at 22.17. So JimV Mod's advice at 22.29 didn't appear there until after and leaves me looking like I'd ignored it.

    I accept the point that people's feelings without evidence are valid, but there really have been a lot of claims in this thread about the validity of private diagnosis and the appearance of over-diagnosis. Some facts would help.

    And can I add that there must be people logging on here who only have self diagnosis, because they cannot get anything better, who cannot feel good faced with the strength of feeling against self diagnosis. If NHS diagnosis was uniformly available UK wide that might be different.

Children
No Data