People who self-diagnose gaining access to services

A major autism organisation is giving access to groups/services for adults with Asperger's and high functioning autism to adults who self-diagnose.

Those who self-diagnose are highly motivated, unlike many adults with autism where motivation can be an issue.  They are more likely to attend groups than those with significant problems. These self-diagnosed adults as service users have a say in how services are run.  In this organisation, they want groups set up that exclude those with Asperger's and high functioning autism who have more problems than they do.

This mirrors what has happened in some online groups for people with Asperger's that have been dominated by those desperately seeking a diagnosis.

What other condition allows those that self-diagnose to be given access to services?  It could be argued that everyone as some autisitic traits i.e. is on the autism spectrum.  But surely the point of diagnosis is to identify those that are in need of support services.  To be given a diagnosis, there must be 'significant impairment'.  Many of those desperate for a diagnosis do not meet the criterea.  For many 'Asperger's Syndrome' seems a trendy diagnosis - it doesn't have the baggage of many conditions linked to the mind/brain.  They have little awarenees of the many difficulties faced by those living with Asperger's/high functioning autism.

I believe allowing people who self-diagnose access to services makes diagnosis meaningless.  In the long term, it is likely to have a negative affect on funding for services for adults.

What are your thoughts?

 

Parents
  • Who are these people and what threat do they pose? Are they getting media attention or any other high profile that would lead to damaging effects on the perception of people with formal diagnosis?

    I can understand if you've not enough going on in your lives to feed your anxieties, this scare story might fill the gap.

    Most websites advise against it. NHS Choices (www.nhs.uk/.../aspx if I have this right), while claiming to have got its diagnosis advice from the NAS website, says "some people are happy with self-diagnosis and decide not to opt for a formal diagnosis" - take it up with NHS Choices if you are worried!

    Autism About has a section on self diagnosis full of cautionary advice, and pages of people's self diasgnosis experience.  These mostly seem to be genuine people trying to solve genuine difficulties in their lives. Adult Diagnosis on the NHS seems to be a postcode lottery.

    Personally I cannot see anything to be gained by fraudulently self-diagnosing. Those with full diagnoses are having trouble accessing resources.

    I continue to view this thread as scaremongering.

Reply
  • Who are these people and what threat do they pose? Are they getting media attention or any other high profile that would lead to damaging effects on the perception of people with formal diagnosis?

    I can understand if you've not enough going on in your lives to feed your anxieties, this scare story might fill the gap.

    Most websites advise against it. NHS Choices (www.nhs.uk/.../aspx if I have this right), while claiming to have got its diagnosis advice from the NAS website, says "some people are happy with self-diagnosis and decide not to opt for a formal diagnosis" - take it up with NHS Choices if you are worried!

    Autism About has a section on self diagnosis full of cautionary advice, and pages of people's self diasgnosis experience.  These mostly seem to be genuine people trying to solve genuine difficulties in their lives. Adult Diagnosis on the NHS seems to be a postcode lottery.

    Personally I cannot see anything to be gained by fraudulently self-diagnosing. Those with full diagnoses are having trouble accessing resources.

    I continue to view this thread as scaremongering.

Children
No Data