People who self-diagnose gaining access to services

A major autism organisation is giving access to groups/services for adults with Asperger's and high functioning autism to adults who self-diagnose.

Those who self-diagnose are highly motivated, unlike many adults with autism where motivation can be an issue.  They are more likely to attend groups than those with significant problems. These self-diagnosed adults as service users have a say in how services are run.  In this organisation, they want groups set up that exclude those with Asperger's and high functioning autism who have more problems than they do.

This mirrors what has happened in some online groups for people with Asperger's that have been dominated by those desperately seeking a diagnosis.

What other condition allows those that self-diagnose to be given access to services?  It could be argued that everyone as some autisitic traits i.e. is on the autism spectrum.  But surely the point of diagnosis is to identify those that are in need of support services.  To be given a diagnosis, there must be 'significant impairment'.  Many of those desperate for a diagnosis do not meet the criterea.  For many 'Asperger's Syndrome' seems a trendy diagnosis - it doesn't have the baggage of many conditions linked to the mind/brain.  They have little awarenees of the many difficulties faced by those living with Asperger's/high functioning autism.

I believe allowing people who self-diagnose access to services makes diagnosis meaningless.  In the long term, it is likely to have a negative affect on funding for services for adults.

What are your thoughts?

 

Parents
  • Former Member
    Former Member

    Shek said:
    Longman, I still think there is a serious issue about those without a diagnosis gaining access to services.  There are only limited resources available, and more cuts are inevitable.  A diagnosis implies 'significant impairment' and need of services. 

    To open services to anyone who decides that they have high functioning autism or Asperger's without a formal assessment can only put what meagre services that are available at serious risk.

    Is there any proof that those without a diagnosis are gaining access to services?  I can't believe that GPs would make referrals without a formal diagnosis.  Isn't it perhaps a case that people who self-diagnose are merely continuing with the treatment they were receiving before they made their self-assessment?  They may tell their counsellor/therapist  that they believe their problems arise from being on the spectrum - and this may be a help in their treatment - but that's as far as it goes.

Reply
  • Former Member
    Former Member

    Shek said:
    Longman, I still think there is a serious issue about those without a diagnosis gaining access to services.  There are only limited resources available, and more cuts are inevitable.  A diagnosis implies 'significant impairment' and need of services. 

    To open services to anyone who decides that they have high functioning autism or Asperger's without a formal assessment can only put what meagre services that are available at serious risk.

    Is there any proof that those without a diagnosis are gaining access to services?  I can't believe that GPs would make referrals without a formal diagnosis.  Isn't it perhaps a case that people who self-diagnose are merely continuing with the treatment they were receiving before they made their self-assessment?  They may tell their counsellor/therapist  that they believe their problems arise from being on the spectrum - and this may be a help in their treatment - but that's as far as it goes.

Children
No Data