Getting drunk/alcohol = illusion of been neurotypical?

It's been almost two years since I got drunk, for the first, and only time. I'm not a social person, and I avoid drink entirely, I don't think most alcohol tastes nice. I was volunteering for a football club at the time as a reporter, and in a massive cup game we won on penalties, we all hit the bar post game and with Ireland V England on the television the drinking just...started, and didn't stop. Everyone other than me was drunk when the coach departed, and with a two hour journey the drinking, indeed kept going. The chairman dared me to drink a can of lager, I drank it all in one gulp, and then I drank a second, and then a third, and I think I ended up drinking 7 cans of lager in less than an hour.

I felt this wonderful rush of emotions. I felt euphoric and I felt I had confidence. But I knew deep down, even then, I could never do what I did that night ever again. I'd always be chasing a feeling I'd never get back. A feeling, and I know this sounds cliche, but the feeling I was finally "cured". Cured after a life time of stimming, stuttering and anxiety. Cured after a life time of self doubt and fear. I felt like finally I was awake after I was sealed away my entire life. I was laughing, joking, flirting, approaching people striking up random conversations. I remember coming home. For the first time ever in my lifetime I actually spoke to my parents about the things on my mind, a failed relationship, a feeling that life wasn't for me, a feeling that I'd never find anyone, but even though I was crying it didn't matter, because in that moment, I was truly free.

Personal circumstances mean I'm considering drinking again, at home. What relationship do you have with alcohol? Have you ever felt a sense of freedom whilst inebriated? 

Parents
  • Yes, I did feel the change with alcohol, but I feel the opposite that it isn't the true me, and I didn't like the loss of control it can bring. I think it's better to be yourself and just do social things that you are happy with rather than trying to force yourself to fit in places you aren't happy.

  • "For all-cause mortality, a meta-analysis of data from eight studies found that moderate drinkers had a 16 percent lower risk of all-cause mortality (death from any cause) compared with lifelong abstainers."

    Swings and roundabouts, like most things in life it is not simple.

  • Sorry I will remove that bit if it's controversial.

  • Hi Martin,

    Thank you for clarifying your intention. I appreciate that you were commenting on the interpretation of medical research rather than intending to give direct medical advice, and I understand your concerns about how research findings can sometimes be presented in the media.

    However, our online community rules do not allow discussions that could be interpreted as providing medical guidance or influencing healthcare decisions. As moderators, we need to take a cautious and consistent approach to ensure the safety of all members. For that reason, we ask contributors to avoid discussing medical research in a way that could be taken as advice about health conditions, treatments, or risks.

    We value the expertise and perspective you bring, but we need all discussions to remain within the boundaries of the group's guidelines.

    Thank you for your understanding.

    Suzanne Mod

  • This is absolutely not medical advice. I have categorically not given any advice whatsoever. It is solely a commentary on medical research. Medical research usually finds its way into the general public's view via media reports which very often are either grossly exaggerated or present results as definitive, when they are not. As a retired biomedical researcher I feel that I need to point this sort of situation out. 

    Headlines often say things like, 'Eating X doubles the risk of oesophageal cancer'. They do not say that it doubles the risk from one in two million to one a million - which is in reality still a very small risk.

Reply
  • This is absolutely not medical advice. I have categorically not given any advice whatsoever. It is solely a commentary on medical research. Medical research usually finds its way into the general public's view via media reports which very often are either grossly exaggerated or present results as definitive, when they are not. As a retired biomedical researcher I feel that I need to point this sort of situation out. 

    Headlines often say things like, 'Eating X doubles the risk of oesophageal cancer'. They do not say that it doubles the risk from one in two million to one a million - which is in reality still a very small risk.

Children
  • Hi Martin,

    Thank you for clarifying your intention. I appreciate that you were commenting on the interpretation of medical research rather than intending to give direct medical advice, and I understand your concerns about how research findings can sometimes be presented in the media.

    However, our online community rules do not allow discussions that could be interpreted as providing medical guidance or influencing healthcare decisions. As moderators, we need to take a cautious and consistent approach to ensure the safety of all members. For that reason, we ask contributors to avoid discussing medical research in a way that could be taken as advice about health conditions, treatments, or risks.

    We value the expertise and perspective you bring, but we need all discussions to remain within the boundaries of the group's guidelines.

    Thank you for your understanding.

    Suzanne Mod