CEASE therapy or homeopathy, any luck?

Hi everyone,

I'm new on here so please be gentle. 

I have a 9 year old daughter diagnosed with ASD when she was 4.  She has alot of the common problems-speech delay, global developmental delay, poor fine and gross motor skills, poor communication/comprehension, sensory problems...etc etc.

She used to be much more severly affected by her condition, especially her sensory ones which have subsided with therapies and general organic improvement and being desensitised by life in general.

A few years ago we had a consultation with Jonathan Toomey and picked up alot of tips about how to change our lives, a lot of which we did.  Prior to this we already had our daughter on high doses of fish oils which made a marked difference.

I came across homeopathy in the form of teething powders for grizzly babies (sure most people have used them).  My youngest has severe reactions to antibiotics and I needed to find any alternative safe form of medicine and remembered the teething powders I'd used on all my children with great success for many years.

I have since bought a few books, read articles online and bought myself a little kit to use at home.  I've used it countless times with excellent results.....how does it work?!  No idea!!!  To be honest, I don't care, I just know that on some weird level, it does!

Anyway, I have now stumbled across something called CEASE therapy which seems to be abit harsher than classical homeopathy.  I'm dubious about trying this as don't want bad reactions for my daughter but interested to know if anyone has used it and what the outcome was.

Thanks for any comments.

Parents
  • My apologies to terrorhawk.

    zone tripper, I would consider it more decent to quote me accurately enough to include the part about my conclusions. I most certainly didn't say that homeopathy 'cured' my sister, nor did I say that faith did, and I make no claims for either. My statements were factual, my opinions my own and honestly held, as are yours.

    This same sister of mine died from a form of lung cancer, brought on by building work according to her consultant, and I just considered that to be ironic. Regarding your statement that faith didn't save your grandparents, I could just as easily say neither did modern medicine. This applies equally to my sister. This is immaterial to the fact that they are no longer with us, and I am sorry for your loss.

    Once again, I would remind you that terrorhawk, as a loving, caring parent, asked a serious question. Instead of putting your point of view and leaving terrorhawk to consider it, you got into an increasingly fierce debate with a homeopathist, Alan, who also posted a point of view. It was distressing me because I felt, strongly, that it was an innapropriate distraction, and direspectful of terrorhawk's request for people to be gentle. You both put your views, and terrorhawk can form an opinion without being browbeaten.

    That's why I asked Alan if he would please stop the debate because he came across to me as more likely to respond, whereas I didn't think that you would readily consider what you were doing. It is clear that you both advocate strongly for your respective views, and I welcome both for my own consideration. My only regret is that we cannot continue this discussion in private, on here.

    We all have views that we strongly advocate for, but we try to emphasise that often, the most we can say is 'in my opinion'. That's what I think.

Reply
  • My apologies to terrorhawk.

    zone tripper, I would consider it more decent to quote me accurately enough to include the part about my conclusions. I most certainly didn't say that homeopathy 'cured' my sister, nor did I say that faith did, and I make no claims for either. My statements were factual, my opinions my own and honestly held, as are yours.

    This same sister of mine died from a form of lung cancer, brought on by building work according to her consultant, and I just considered that to be ironic. Regarding your statement that faith didn't save your grandparents, I could just as easily say neither did modern medicine. This applies equally to my sister. This is immaterial to the fact that they are no longer with us, and I am sorry for your loss.

    Once again, I would remind you that terrorhawk, as a loving, caring parent, asked a serious question. Instead of putting your point of view and leaving terrorhawk to consider it, you got into an increasingly fierce debate with a homeopathist, Alan, who also posted a point of view. It was distressing me because I felt, strongly, that it was an innapropriate distraction, and direspectful of terrorhawk's request for people to be gentle. You both put your views, and terrorhawk can form an opinion without being browbeaten.

    That's why I asked Alan if he would please stop the debate because he came across to me as more likely to respond, whereas I didn't think that you would readily consider what you were doing. It is clear that you both advocate strongly for your respective views, and I welcome both for my own consideration. My only regret is that we cannot continue this discussion in private, on here.

    We all have views that we strongly advocate for, but we try to emphasise that often, the most we can say is 'in my opinion'. That's what I think.

Children
No Data