• Replies 53 replies
  • Subscribers 25 subscribers
  • Views 13103 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Asperger Syndrome should the label stay?

David

My family and I refused to believe that I was Autistic until we were told in family therapy in 1990 that I had Asperger Syndrome.

 

In 1966 aged nine a Psychiatrist wanted to send me to a special school for Autistic children.

She looked up Autism in the dictionary and it said that Autistic children cannot speak.

By the age of nine I could speak fluently so she thought I could not possible be Autistic so I went to main stream schools.

In 1976 a Psychiatrist who visited us said that I was mildly Autistic.

We did not believe him either and his successor also said that I was not Autistic.

 

In 1990 my Father asked in family therapy when I was not in the room if I had been more strictly brought up whether I would have turned out better.

The family therapist said that the way I am has nothing to do with up bringing but because I have Asperger Syndrome.

After that we could believe that I have Asperger Syndrome and my Father stopped blaming my Mother for how I am.

As a matter of fact the only thing on my records is the Psychiatrist in 1976 who said that I was mildly Autistic

The question must be asked is how are we going to describe people who are not really Autistic at all.

We could describe Asperger people as just having Autistic traits.

The difference between an Asperger person and a so calle.d NT person can be very slight and the difference between an Asperger person and an Autistic person is often great.

We should not lump Asperger people with Autistic people.

The NAS leaflets would have to be changed if the Asperger label disappeared.

It could be a step back removing the Asperger label which I understand they are going to do next year in the USA.

David

Parents

  • Temple said:

    i hate all these god dam labels your that your that and so on we people that what we are myself you can call me what you like autistic a nut case whatever you want.

    Whilst I can understand where you coming from, and to a certain extent agree with you, I also think that taking such an extreme stance is also pretty pointless.

    After all, why say we're 'people' why not just 'mammals'?

    Is it perhaps because there are very real differences between, for example, horses, pigs, cows, humans, and all other types of mammal?

    Is it not also useful to give those differences a concise name, rather than a lengthy description?

    It's just the same with different types of people. And the categorisation of people, as long as it is along reasonable lines, is even more useful for dealing with those different categories of people.

    For example you have stated that you have a mental health condition, and, whatever that condition is, it will have specific symptoms, and specific treatments, so, by identifying those symptoms, grouping them, and naming them, it is then easier for practitioners to give you the right, more effective, treatments, rather than giving you wrong, ineffective, treatments designed to treat a different condition.

Reply

  • Temple said:

    i hate all these god dam labels your that your that and so on we people that what we are myself you can call me what you like autistic a nut case whatever you want.

    Whilst I can understand where you coming from, and to a certain extent agree with you, I also think that taking such an extreme stance is also pretty pointless.

    After all, why say we're 'people' why not just 'mammals'?

    Is it perhaps because there are very real differences between, for example, horses, pigs, cows, humans, and all other types of mammal?

    Is it not also useful to give those differences a concise name, rather than a lengthy description?

    It's just the same with different types of people. And the categorisation of people, as long as it is along reasonable lines, is even more useful for dealing with those different categories of people.

    For example you have stated that you have a mental health condition, and, whatever that condition is, it will have specific symptoms, and specific treatments, so, by identifying those symptoms, grouping them, and naming them, it is then easier for practitioners to give you the right, more effective, treatments, rather than giving you wrong, ineffective, treatments designed to treat a different condition.

Children
No Data