Asperger Syndrome should the label stay?

My family and I refused to believe that I was Autistic until we were told in family therapy in 1990 that I had Asperger Syndrome.

 

In 1966 aged nine a Psychiatrist wanted to send me to a special school for Autistic children.

She looked up Autism in the dictionary and it said that Autistic children cannot speak.

By the age of nine I could speak fluently so she thought I could not possible be Autistic so I went to main stream schools.

In 1976 a Psychiatrist who visited us said that I was mildly Autistic.

We did not believe him either and his successor also said that I was not Autistic.

 

In 1990 my Father asked in family therapy when I was not in the room if I had been more strictly brought up whether I would have turned out better.

The family therapist said that the way I am has nothing to do with up bringing but because I have Asperger Syndrome.

After that we could believe that I have Asperger Syndrome and my Father stopped blaming my Mother for how I am.

As a matter of fact the only thing on my records is the Psychiatrist in 1976 who said that I was mildly Autistic

The question must be asked is how are we going to describe people who are not really Autistic at all.

We could describe Asperger people as just having Autistic traits.

The difference between an Asperger person and a so calle.d NT person can be very slight and the difference between an Asperger person and an Autistic person is often great.

We should not lump Asperger people with Autistic people.

The NAS leaflets would have to be changed if the Asperger label disappeared.

It could be a step back removing the Asperger label which I understand they are going to do next year in the USA.

David

Parents
  • Playing the "I have this, that, and these other co-existing conditions therefor it falls into the such and such category" is pointless.

    As Tony Attwood says "When you've met one person with Asperger's, you've met ONE person with Asperger's".

    Not only is Asperger's part of the Autistic spectrum, but, like all ranges within that spectrum, it is a spectrum itself!

    And having co-existing conditions doesn't mean we're not part of the autistic spectrum, it just means one has co-existing conditions.

    I mean, some people with Asperger's also have mental health conditions, so does that mean we should lump Asperger's in with mental health conditions?

    NO! It doesn't! Why? Because Asperger's IS NOT a mental health condition!

    Likewise Asperger's shouldn't be lumped in with other non-autistic conditions, because it is not a non-autistic condition!

    We should not try and make Asperger's something that it isn't!

    Oh, and to all those "I'm not Autistic, I have Asperger's" people out there - get over it already! You have Asperger's, therefor you are autistic! It is nothing to be ashamed of!

Reply
  • Playing the "I have this, that, and these other co-existing conditions therefor it falls into the such and such category" is pointless.

    As Tony Attwood says "When you've met one person with Asperger's, you've met ONE person with Asperger's".

    Not only is Asperger's part of the Autistic spectrum, but, like all ranges within that spectrum, it is a spectrum itself!

    And having co-existing conditions doesn't mean we're not part of the autistic spectrum, it just means one has co-existing conditions.

    I mean, some people with Asperger's also have mental health conditions, so does that mean we should lump Asperger's in with mental health conditions?

    NO! It doesn't! Why? Because Asperger's IS NOT a mental health condition!

    Likewise Asperger's shouldn't be lumped in with other non-autistic conditions, because it is not a non-autistic condition!

    We should not try and make Asperger's something that it isn't!

    Oh, and to all those "I'm not Autistic, I have Asperger's" people out there - get over it already! You have Asperger's, therefor you are autistic! It is nothing to be ashamed of!

Children
No Data