Asperger Syndrome should the label stay?

My family and I refused to believe that I was Autistic until we were told in family therapy in 1990 that I had Asperger Syndrome.

 

In 1966 aged nine a Psychiatrist wanted to send me to a special school for Autistic children.

She looked up Autism in the dictionary and it said that Autistic children cannot speak.

By the age of nine I could speak fluently so she thought I could not possible be Autistic so I went to main stream schools.

In 1976 a Psychiatrist who visited us said that I was mildly Autistic.

We did not believe him either and his successor also said that I was not Autistic.

 

In 1990 my Father asked in family therapy when I was not in the room if I had been more strictly brought up whether I would have turned out better.

The family therapist said that the way I am has nothing to do with up bringing but because I have Asperger Syndrome.

After that we could believe that I have Asperger Syndrome and my Father stopped blaming my Mother for how I am.

As a matter of fact the only thing on my records is the Psychiatrist in 1976 who said that I was mildly Autistic

The question must be asked is how are we going to describe people who are not really Autistic at all.

We could describe Asperger people as just having Autistic traits.

The difference between an Asperger person and a so calle.d NT person can be very slight and the difference between an Asperger person and an Autistic person is often great.

We should not lump Asperger people with Autistic people.

The NAS leaflets would have to be changed if the Asperger label disappeared.

It could be a step back removing the Asperger label which I understand they are going to do next year in the USA.

David

Parents
  • Given that Hans Asperger's original subjects are I gather deemed no longer typical, I guess it has always been on the cards that the name might be changed. Last time I asked my GP whether they still had my diagnosis on file, his comment was that old cookie "Aspergers, is that a new vegetable?", but it didn't get me any further. My GP also believes Aspergers only happens in childhood. A fundamental problem we have is that GPs don't take it seriously, and I don't see any progeress being made until GPs are confronted with the folly of their attitude. Besides, treating potentially aspergers individuals for anxiety and stress and other conditions, while disregarding aspergers as a factor, surely costs the NHS more in inappropriate treatments.

    So I concur we are in for a change in recognition, and probably to the further disadvantage of all of us so diagnosed.

Reply
  • Given that Hans Asperger's original subjects are I gather deemed no longer typical, I guess it has always been on the cards that the name might be changed. Last time I asked my GP whether they still had my diagnosis on file, his comment was that old cookie "Aspergers, is that a new vegetable?", but it didn't get me any further. My GP also believes Aspergers only happens in childhood. A fundamental problem we have is that GPs don't take it seriously, and I don't see any progeress being made until GPs are confronted with the folly of their attitude. Besides, treating potentially aspergers individuals for anxiety and stress and other conditions, while disregarding aspergers as a factor, surely costs the NHS more in inappropriate treatments.

    So I concur we are in for a change in recognition, and probably to the further disadvantage of all of us so diagnosed.

Children
No Data