• Replies 13 replies
  • Subscribers 79 subscribers
  • Views 4323 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

the 15% in full time emplyment

longman

Reading the news item on the website about the Queen's Speech, with reference to the Full Employment and Welfare Benefits Bill, there is again that reference to only 15% with autism in full time work.

Figures like that usually move up and down a bit over the years, and it has certainly been a figure in circulation for at least ten years.

How was it obtained? Was it a survey of NAS members? Or was it a national survey by an organisation independent of NAS? Was it obtained by the Department of Work and Pensions?

What does it mean, beyond what it says? How was the in-work population defined, given a lot of people on the spectrum, who are in work,  aren't necessarily easily identified to be included.

The context of this is people whom the government perceives can work. Their notion of who has autism and their notion of work is quite critical.

I don't feel this unchanging 15% figure is doing us any good.

Parents

  • The NAS site says the figure is 10% and say they got it from:

     Redman, S et al (2009). Don't Write Me Off: Make the system fair for people with autism. London: The National Autistic Society, p8

    Which is one of their publications and gives o clue as to how they arrived at the figure.

    I work for a local council that doesn't think it important to monitor how many employees are autistic, if someone asked them how many autistic people they employed they would be unable to answer. They probably be surprised there were any at all. They aren't unusual so where do these figures come from?

Reply

  • The NAS site says the figure is 10% and say they got it from:

     Redman, S et al (2009). Don't Write Me Off: Make the system fair for people with autism. London: The National Autistic Society, p8

    Which is one of their publications and gives o clue as to how they arrived at the figure.

    I work for a local council that doesn't think it important to monitor how many employees are autistic, if someone asked them how many autistic people they employed they would be unable to answer. They probably be surprised there were any at all. They aren't unusual so where do these figures come from?

Children
No Data