legalised cycling on pavements - cycle-to-work campaign

I find cyclists passing me especially from behind quite disturbing, and I really do jump when one of them rings a bell right behind me. I've seen others post about this, so thought it might be appropriate to flag up recent developments that might affect people on the spectrum.

There's a lot of drive at the moment towards green (environmentally friendly) travel, one manifestation of which is the cycle-to-work campaign. Most local authorities have policies to make it easier to cycle to work.

The commonest solution is to make cycling on the pavements legal, either a shared surface, or segregated with a white line down the middle (or usually not quite middle - more space for cyclists than pedestrians). There are Dept for transport Guidelines (LTN 1/12) which say segregated pavements should not be less than 4 metres and shared pavements not less than 3 metres. In reality the widths implemented are well below that. Quite often now pavements less than 1.5 metres wide are shared walking and cycling, and segregated often less than 3 metres.

On segregated pavements this often means pedestrians walk in a 1 to 1.5 metre strip on the inside of the pavement, irrespective of street furniture (lamp posts, telecoms units, litter bins), overgrown hedges etc. This creates problems for wheelchair users and other disabled.

Cyclists and pedestrians are now in very close proximity, with the cyclists rights protected, and often expecting to cycle fast.

With so much of this policy of opening up pavements to cyclists going on, there must be some quite scary situations for people on the spectrum.

Has anyone had any adverse experiences?

Parents
  • My main bugbear concerns the reckless and antisocial cyclists who cycle on the pavement when there is clear signage prohibiting this. A considerate cyclist will slow down and give the pedestrian right of way, without expecting the pedestrian to reciprocate - after all, the pedestrian has right of way on most pavements. Antisocial cyclists, on the other hand, will swerve past you at top speed, often not even ringing the bell. I get very angry when this happens, and I have been known to shout after them, telling them that ''you are not supposed to cycle down here!''. However, they seldom listen, and the most they might say is ''I know''. They just don't care, but then if they did, they would not be so antisocial in the first place.

    On the other hand, I understand how dangerous it can be for cyclists to travel on the road, and I support clearly defined cycle lanes.

Reply
  • My main bugbear concerns the reckless and antisocial cyclists who cycle on the pavement when there is clear signage prohibiting this. A considerate cyclist will slow down and give the pedestrian right of way, without expecting the pedestrian to reciprocate - after all, the pedestrian has right of way on most pavements. Antisocial cyclists, on the other hand, will swerve past you at top speed, often not even ringing the bell. I get very angry when this happens, and I have been known to shout after them, telling them that ''you are not supposed to cycle down here!''. However, they seldom listen, and the most they might say is ''I know''. They just don't care, but then if they did, they would not be so antisocial in the first place.

    On the other hand, I understand how dangerous it can be for cyclists to travel on the road, and I support clearly defined cycle lanes.

Children
No Data