This was actually from my very well meaning supervisor, but when explaining that I worked from home one day a week so that I would be able to do a DSA support call for my autism (the uni has 0 places on campus to take a teams call ) response was pretty much 'What is that, and why would you need it?'
First of all, working out and phrasing concisely exactly what a DSA mentor does is not easy, especially in the moment. And academics in general don't know anything about what DSA is or what it does (partly by design).
But also, I know that the reason she is in a position to ask "Why would you need it?" is because of the 4 years of having a DSA mentor and study skills support worker. This vaguely functional PhD student is the work of many years, and had she been involved in my undergraduate days, the need would have been immediately obvious. However, new challenges turn up all the time, so having that support maintained is very useful (also DSA have continued to see fit to assign me the money to pay the mentor so they clearly think I still need it)
This isn't the first time this has happened, people see me do something well with accommodations, and ask why I needed the accommodations if I could do it like that. The assumption I'd be equally good without the accommodations is ridiculous of course, but they don't tend to notice that bit.
Anyway, I just was wondering how you guys respond to this kind of interaction? When people see the success, and the accommodation, but don't seem able to put two and two together, and assume that means you'd do equally well without the accommodation.
Also, what accommodation/support/technique is making a quiet world of difference in your life?