What would human society be like if the majority were Autistic?

Recently  started this thread: A different view of "disability"  which got me thinking.

So, what if autism was actually the predominant neurotype? Would we still call it Autism, or would we be called neurotypical? What would the minority who have what we now call neurotypical traits be called? Atypical? Collectivism?

What would our society look like if it had been tailored to our needs? Here are some ideas:

Communication and socialising: Instead of shaking hands we might bow, like Japanese people. Small talk wouldn't be acceptable, only discussion of things needing to be done or special interests. Mobile phones might not have the facility to speak to someone, just the facility to text or email.

Socialising: might only be via special interest groups, such as chess or art clubs, or "silent" discos. No music would be allowed in pubs, only pub quizzes. I'm not sure if we would have restaurants? Maybe just takeaways? Cinemas would provide individual headsets to listen to the movie soundtrack, or you could take your own.

Travel & shopping: Noisy engines would not be allowed, and by now we would probably have only electric vehicles. On public transport, seats would be spaced out to prevent people sitting too near each other. Music not allowed to be played on public transport or in shops. People would be required to stand at least 3 feet apart in queues.

Homes: Would all be soundproofed, with tall fences around gardens for privacy. Barbeques, bonfires and indoor open fires would be banned to prevent the smell of smoke causing distress. Making noise in a garden would be an arrestable offence.

Emergency services: emergency vehicle sirens would be quieter. Police would use drones to patrol their areas. Hospitals might have all single rooms, not shared wards, with internet access available to all patients. 

What do you think a society shaped by autistic people would be like?

Parents
  • Information sharing would be significantly better and expectations for different situations would be made very clear. The use of metaphors etc would likely reduce.

    Restaurant menus would be completely different. Dishes would probably be defaulted to plain with the option to add various different things for those that like it. Things like chicken nuggets and chips would become an option on the adult menu.

    There would be more signage around to warn people of sensory difficulties such as noise and smells so that people that struggle with that could avoid it (I have actually seen this in a zoo and thought it was brilliant for inclusivity.

    Job interviews would be completely different. You'd be told the questions in advance for processing time. You wouldn't sit in such an intimidating way with it being you Vs the interview panel. 

    The education system would be completely different. Smaller classes. Sound proofed classrooms. More quiet spaces particularly for break and lunch. More individualised learning.

    I could probably keep going. I love this concept. I know in reality it wouldn't be like we are imagining. But it's nice to think about.

  • Information sharing would be significantly better and expectations for different situations would be made very clear.

    The flip side of this is that there would be detailed manuals about how to do almost everything which cover every possible eventuality so we would take many times longer to read the guide than do the task.

    I wonder if innovation would stop too because of those who cannot cope with change? Would we have to do this so as not to offend them?

    It would be interesting to see how those with autism and a need for organisation and structure would co-exist with the auDHD people - would we end up in civil war?

    This scenario has as many twists as a slinky Slight smile

Reply
  • Information sharing would be significantly better and expectations for different situations would be made very clear.

    The flip side of this is that there would be detailed manuals about how to do almost everything which cover every possible eventuality so we would take many times longer to read the guide than do the task.

    I wonder if innovation would stop too because of those who cannot cope with change? Would we have to do this so as not to offend them?

    It would be interesting to see how those with autism and a need for organisation and structure would co-exist with the auDHD people - would we end up in civil war?

    This scenario has as many twists as a slinky Slight smile

Children
  • Oh I absolutely realise it would not go how it has in my head but one can dream. Haha.

    I wonder whether people would struggle with change as much if the majority of people were aware of the difficulty. I know for myself and many I know, the problem with change is not being warned or given a sufficient amount of information. I think people would be much better at ensuring this happened. I always manage it better if someone just explains why.

    I don't think innovation would stop but I do think there'd be more than one camp of people. Those for and those against at least. I think a lot of the innovations that happen are thought up by neurodivergent people because they think differently. But there would also be people that were rigidly against it. I think that will always be the way. I do wonder if we need to stop being so innovative at some point. As useful as things like the internet are, tech etc is becoming increasingly dangerous. The better the tech gets, the better the criminals get. I do wonder whether we will go too far one day. I may have taken this off at a complete tangent but oh well.

    Being AuDHD myself I think my own brain is already a war - it doesn't agree with itself, let alone anyone else.