• Replies 59 replies
  • Subscribers 86 subscribers
  • Views 2434 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Navigating the Structural Maze: Reclaiming Our Context in a Hostile Socio-Political Landscape

Phased
Hi everyone,
(Just a quick heads-up: I used an AI tool to help me structure, polish, and organize my thoughts for this new thread, but the underlying insights, reflections, and strategic focus are entirely my own personal perspective as a late-diagnosed adult.)
Following some deeply resonant discussions on a previous thread regarding how our bodies physically map burnout, several of us began touching on the wider, structural barriers we face. Because that original space was dedicated strictly to somatic tracking and interoception, I wanted to open this separate thread specifically to swap notes on how we navigate the current socio-political architecture without draining our remaining baseline energy.
When I was first late-diagnosed, my focus was entirely internal—figuring out how my mind worked and understanding my traits. But looking at recent media coverage—like the BBC In Depth piece on Uta Frith questioning the width of the spectrum, paired with headlines warning of "chaos" and "spiralling costs"—I have felt a second wave of realisation. I think we are seeing a shift from a passively negligent environment to an actively hostile mainstream narrative. It concerns me that these stories subtly condition the public to blame "too much demand" from patients, rather than addressing years of structural underfunding. Finding official data, like the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s report showing a 207% surge in complaints driven by broken local systems, completely validated for me that the crisis is systemic, not personal.
I think that when we are caught in high-pressure sectors or dealing with broken public service silos, our natural instinct is to want to fix the whole machine. However, I have had to accept that I do not have the power to change large, unyielding institutions. For me, navigating this landscape safely has required moving away from abstract political debates—what I think of as the Life of Brian style of endless amphitheater semantics—and instead treating the word "disability" as a highly practical, legal lever. Even when we are forced to access these statutory frameworks like the Equality Act and Acas guidance retroactively, after a workplace or medical crisis has already hit, they remain vital tools. Using that framework to analyse a past breakdown is a way of executing an essential piece of hindsight—identifying exactly how unwell an unmasked system becomes under chronic stress, so we can use that data to rebuild and protect our baselines moving forward.
The truth is, if one were to go through the previous posts on this forum, the library of these survival tools is absolutely already there, and the NAS has already built an extensive advice section outlining our rights. I don't think our community suffers from a lack of official blueprints; rather, that static knowledge is often fragmented or buried under the daily demands of crisis management. I see this thread not as a replacement for those resources, but as a practical bridge to them—a bottom-up space where we can translate their legal hardware into our lived life. When the official support systems are broken, turning our shared notes into an indexed, real-world toolkit is how we stop asking permission to exist from an architecture that isn't built for us, and instead focus entirely on our own safety, well-being, and mutual preservation and how we are part of society.
I would love to open this space up to see how others navigate these structural layers:
  • How do you protect your personal peace and counter the anxiety caused by recent mainstream headlines and diagnostic debates?
  • For those who have had to access legal frameworks or workplace guidelines retroactively after a crisis, what helped you find the energy to utilize them?
  • How do you balance the emotional grief of admitting how unwell an unmasked system actually is with the empowerment of protecting your health, mind, and soul?
I think that by swapping these notes, we are actively identifying our shared thread, creating a collective library of survival tools so we can safely navigate our way back home to our own baselines.
Best wishes,
Phased
  • in reply to TheCatWoman

    I suspect a reason why  Equipment once issued becomes "used". Somewhere along the line "used" euipment got re-issued and it broke - possibly injuring someone - so out goes an edict that all equipment issued has to be new... And if the retail supplier to he nhs or similar doesn't get arm-locked into picking up the old stuff it kicks around the local depot either getting in their way or getting re-issued (an that breaks the edict...).  So the retail supplier ends up selling more new stuff and the old stuff becomes a pain in the butt for the depot.  So there's not much incentive for them to pick up the old - easier for let people out there take it to dispose of it themselves... So yes why advertise where to return it when they don't want it back....   Daft I agree but there is sometimes method in madness... glad you're getting it sorted now - well done for being determined.

  • in reply to TheCatWoman

    I'm so sorry. I tried several ways to get the number and that's all I could obtain. It's intensely frustrating thaty it's so difficult to find anything. Good luck for Tuesday!

  • in reply to Alexa

    Well the maze tried to get me again, I phone the number Alexa gave me and it was the wrong one, they told me to go back to Anglesey council, I told them I had and they know nothing, the woman on the phone did eventually find the right number, but the place that does it all is under a name that in no way relates to anything they do. I did eventually get hold of them and they're coming on tuesday, they thought it was funny that they're so hard to find and give no clues on any of the equipment. I think its deliberate obfuscation, one of htose things you either know or don't and they're not interested in making it easier

  • in reply to Alexa

    Thank you so much Alexa, this really helps.

    Phased, I seem to be able to teach my son to do things fine, but then I can do lots of things either right or left handed, so much so that I can get confused as to which hand I should be using and sometimes forget how to use cutlery.

  • in reply to TheCatWoman

    My wife suggested I should try some figs this morning when I described a problem I had just had!

    My dad was really phased when he saw me switch from right to left hand and back when painting the family house for him.  People stare at themselves in a mirror every day and think they're looking at themselves!  Maybe get a mirror so he can watch you doing the decorating teaching in that - might mean it sorts out that visual backwards flip experienced?

    My mum and dad's generation got clouted with a ruler when they tried to use their left hand to write and draw with - barbaric...

     's thoughtful and useful post also has an e-mail address if you fancy trying the written approach to stuff - can't say it's bullet proof but at least it's what is called "asynchronous" meaning there's time to think about and compose what one writes - and also it leaves a "paper trail" in the maze for future reference...

    all the best

  • in reply to Phased

    Thank you, I feel like we should send them all a dose of syrup of figs, to get their systems moving.

    So much feels blocked right now, I know what needs doing, but until others move, I can't. I'm going to hire a storage unit to store my friends stuff until he or his son decide what to do with it. I'm having some wiring work done on the house in a few weeks, this has been held up due to my friends stubbourness about having to move any of his stuff so as the electrician can access a broken wire under the floorboards.

     At least when thats done I can get a plumber in to restore the en-suite shower room, from the not really working bathroom my friend installed and get the downstairs bathroom fixed too. Then I can start the wonderful task of teaching my son to decorate, he's a southpaw and get very wound up by people who are unable to accept that what they're asking him to do is backwards to him. I don't think a wall minds if its painted right to left or left to right, a paintbrush isn't handed, nor is a roller. I find it really upsetting that so many people have made him feel so clumsy and disempowered because they can't work out how to show him to do things left handed.

  • in reply to TheCatWoman

    Here you go for phone numbers about returning equipment (although it took a fair amount of online digging!) I beleive you're in north Wales?

  • in reply to TheCatWoman
    Hi @The CatWoman,
    Reading about your day made my own system, funnily enough despite being pretty nacked myself, sparked me up to want to see if I can write anything to help you. You have just described the absolute, literal reality of the "Place That Sends You Mad" from The Twelve Tasks of Asterix. It is completely maddening.
    Your feeling that you must be speaking a different language hits the absolute centre of what I experience when my system is down. It is that bizarre, dreamlike stupidity where you ask a highly specific, logical question, and the person behind the desk interprets it through a tiny transactional token, entirely missing the actual context of what you need. Being told by an outpatient OT to go back to the GP to get re-referred to a community OT whose appointments the GP surgery already manages is a level of circular, institutional absurdity that you literally couldn't make up.
    As I’ve tracked the history of these setups, I’ve realized this fragmentation isn't an accident; it is the direct legacy of what I think of as the Marketisation Shock. Over the last few decades, legislative changes—stretching from the 1990 internal market reforms right through to the 2012 Health and Social Care Act—systematically injected commercial business mechanisms into the heart of the NHS. By dividing the service into "purchasers and providers" and forcing hospitals and clinics to act like competing businesses focused on transaction tokens, the corporate tier essentially replaced holistic, interconnected human care with rigid financial and activity targets. In that hyper-accelerated environment, a simple, logical bio-psycho-social request becomes an administrative "blockage" to their fast-paced throughput. You are left dealing with a collection of completely isolated, blind organisational silos that actively refuse to talk to one another.
    That feeling that "these people couldn't lie straight in bed" is exactly why I had to drop the emotional armour and treat the bureaucratic hardware purely as an analog legal lever this week. When the architecture is that broken, I’ve found that my only option to protect my camp is to completely refuse the verbal runaround, put everything in compressed, undeniable written signposts, and let the statutory rules force the machine to route the file properly behind the scenes.
    You are dealing with an immense, exhausting amount of structural friction there, especially while trying to navigate the complex human reality of your friend's situation on top of it. I am sending you solidarity from across the maze today. I hope you can find a pocket of space this evening to just step completely away from the machinery, let the circular questions go, and let your own system rest in its actual nature.
    Best wishes,
    Phased
  • in reply to Phased

    Another day in the maze, I had to contact social services about my friend who used to live with me and what to do with all his stuff and could they help? They can't, they won't text me the number of the place to contact to send his equipment back too, he had things like walking frames and toilet frames delievered here and I can't find the phone number to send them back. It's nothing to do with them. They'd only phoned me up as they can't get hold of him or know where he is, it seems like he's turned his phone off again, managed to cancel the DD again or lost his charger. They seemed amazed I didn't have another way of contacting him and even more amazed when I said that I was the last person he'd want to see because he blames me for all the woes that have befallen him over the last 3 months or so, they also seemed unaware of how badly he's dementing.

    Then I tried to contact the OT woman who works out of my GP's surgery, they don't know anything about her, she's just someone who's appointments they manage, they said she worked out of the local cottage hospital. So I went there and spoke to an OT there, they only do out patients and not community work, they know community work exists, but nothing about who does it or where its based and suggested I go back to the GP and get re-reffered?

    Then they wonder why people get angry and frustrated! All our records are supposed to be able to be accessed by any hospital anywhere in Wales, they should be up to date so that any doctor can see what you've been treated for, when and why and what meds you have. This one, no, she could see that I'd seen a physio last week and was it about that? Was I confused about exercises?

    It's been another one of those days where I feel like a must speak a different language to everybody as it seems the ony reason for them not understanding a simple question. It all feel so daft, almost dream like in its stupidity and the inablility of any one you speak to actually answer your question, but answer a different one. I'm starting to feel like these people couldn't lie straight in bed!

  • Bringing the Pieces Together: My Administrative Execution Manual
    Hi everyone,
    A huge nod of gratitude to   —your sharp insights on navigating institutional trauma and these rigid medical architectures have been an absolute lifeline while my system has been down. I also want to give a massive nod to my collaborative use of AI support throughout this process; it has acted as my vital accessibility buffer, doing the heavy text processing and structural lifting so I can safely express these deep, interconnected patterns without draining my flatlined executive bandwidth.  And also not the least my family and friends who aren't in this forum thread but without which I'd have been lost.
    Reading back through our shared threads brings a classic line from Alice's Restaurant to mind. To paraphrase the old song: if one person walks into a bureaucracy and lays out an interconnected somatic map, they might think you're mad and shrug you off. If two people do it, they might think you're a bit weird and ignore you both. But if three people do it? They start to realize it is an organization, a collective movement, and a direct threat to their rigid comfort. We are building that very architecture right here.
    I wanted to circle back to this thread and share a real-time update on how treating the statutory framework of the Equality Act as a practical, analog lever actually played out in my own life this morning.
    As I mapped out in my other logs, my body and mind hit a wall of absolute cellular insolvency under the weight of an unyielding medical and workplace bureaucracy. When my blood work initially returned confirming my active autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto's), the surgery's default frontline response was a passive, automated six-month wait.
    Trying to shoehorn a multi-systemic, interconnected physical collapse into a rigid, fast-paced neurotypical framework was profoundly activating. The surrounding architecture is simply not engineered to process deep pattern data; it defaults to a high-velocity, transaction-token style of administrative gatekeeping that feels passively hostile to my processing style. This was perfectly illustrated by the practice's abrupt, informal written response to me, which completely bypassed standard professional address to default to a curt "Morning".
    Rather than expending my volatile energy trying to argue with the machine or complain about their communication formatting, I chose to treat "disability" strictly as an undeniable legal shield. I used the online portal to submit a formal request for a written "reasonable adjustment" under the Equality Act, explicitly stating that my metabolic battery was flat and I could not handle live verbal triage.
    My Structural Outcome:
    The institutional freeze broke instantly. By restricting my communication to bare, compressed clinical signposts, the machine was forced to pause and route my file through an official clinician triage.
    While the surgery firmly held the line on the strict clinical rulebook (refusing synthetic hormones until a repeat panel confirms the baseline in line with guidelines), my self-advocacy successfully cleared a massive administrative bottleneck:
    • Timeline Fast-Track: The automated 6-month delay was entirely overridden, bringing my repeat panels forward to the absolute regulatory minimum of 14 October 2026.
    • Advanced Diagnostics: Second-line safety screening (MMA and Anti-Intrinsic Factor Antibody tests) was successfully authorized and added to the panel.
    • Urgent Escalation: My pending gallbladder ultrasound referral was officially upgraded to urgent.
    My Lesson:
    The system loves to expect an individual in the thick of an allostatic crash to manually navigate a barcode maze. But by dropping the emotional armor and letting the documented statutory rules do the heavy lifting from the bottom up, I protected my camp from the inside.
    I have now secured a clean, undisturbed 5-week perimeter to step completely into non-doing ("Wu Wei") and allow my engine to cool down before my October test date. I didn't change the institution, but I forced the architecture to bend enough for my unmasked system to safely survive it.
    I am sharing this to show that our legal levers are not just abstract ideas—they are highly functional shields when tailored to our exact biological boundaries. I am slowly compiling these real-world workarounds and personal insights as part of a larger project titled "The Late-Diagnosed Reclamation Toolkit: A Somatic, Structural, and Molecular Safety Manual for Autistic Burnout," which I hope to find a way to safely and respectfully share more widely once my engine has fully healed.
    Best wishes,
    Phased
    (Note for transparency and forum guidelines: I am sharing these scientific reflections, somatic tracking methods, and personal administrative workarounds purely as an autobiographical record of my own health journey and mutual peer support. These insights are strictly personal and are not intended to serve as medical or legal advice. Always seek independent professional guidance regarding medical diagnostics, medication titration, or statutory legal matters.)
  • Bringing the Pieces Together: My Administrative Execution Manual
    Hi everyone,
    A huge nod of gratitude to @Alexa
    Alexa said:
    Good luck!
     and @TheCatWoman
    TheCatWoman said:
    I'm glad that you started this thread and the others, I've been really enjoying reading and writing them.
    —your sharp insights on navigating institutional trauma and these rigid medical architectures have been an absolute lifeline while my system has been down. I also want to give a massive nod to my collaborative use of AI support throughout this process; it has acted as my vital accessibility buffer, doing the heavy text processing and structural lifting so I can safely express these deep, interconnected patterns without draining my flatlined executive bandwidth.
    Reading back through our shared threads brings a classic line from Alice's Restaurant to mind. To paraphrase the old song: if one person walks into a bureaucracy and lays out an interconnected somatic map, they might think you're mad and shrug you off. If two people do it, they might think you're a bit weird and ignore you both. But if three people do it? They start to realize it is an organization, a collective movement, and a direct threat to their rigid comfort. We are building that very architecture right here.
    I wanted to circle back to this thread and share a real-time update on how treating the statutory framework of the Equality Act as a practical, analog lever actually played out in my own life this morning.
    As I mapped out in my other logs, my body and mind hit a wall of absolute cellular insolvency under the weight of an unyielding medical and workplace bureaucracy. When my blood work initially returned confirming my active autoimmune thyroiditis (Hashimoto's), the surgery's default frontline response was a passive, automated six-month wait.
    Trying to shoehorn a multi-systemic, interconnected physical collapse into a rigid, fast-paced neurotypical framework was profoundly activating. The surrounding architecture is simply not engineered to process deep pattern data; it defaults to a high-velocity, transaction-token style of administrative gatekeeping that feels passively hostile to my processing style. This was perfectly illustrated by the practice's abrupt, informal written response to me, which completely bypassed standard professional address to default to a curt "Morning".
    Rather than expending my volatile energy trying to argue with the machine or complain about their communication formatting, I chose to treat "disability" strictly as an undeniable legal shield. I used the online portal to submit a formal request for a written "reasonable adjustment" under the Equality Act, explicitly stating that my metabolic battery was flat and I could not handle live verbal triage.
    My Structural Outcome:
    The institutional freeze broke instantly. By restricting my communication to bare, compressed clinical signposts, the machine was forced to pause and route my file through an official clinician triage.
    While the surgery firmly held the line on the strict clinical rulebook (refusing synthetic hormones until a repeat panel confirms the baseline in line with guidelines), my self-advocacy successfully cleared a massive administrative bottleneck:
    • Timeline Fast-Track: The automated 6-month delay was entirely overridden, bringing my repeat panels forward to the absolute regulatory minimum of 14 October 2026.
    • Advanced Diagnostics: Second-line safety screening (MMA and Anti-Intrinsic Factor Antibody tests) was successfully authorized and added to the panel.
    • Urgent Escalation: My pending gallbladder ultrasound referral was officially upgraded to urgent.
    My Lesson:
    The system loves to expect an individual in the thick of an allostatic crash to manually navigate a barcode maze. But by dropping the emotional armor and letting the documented statutory rules do the heavy lifting from the bottom up, I protected my camp from the inside.
    I have now secured a clean, undisturbed 5-week perimeter to step completely into non-doing ("Wu Wei") and allow my engine to cool down before my October test date. I didn't change the institution, but I forced the architecture to bend enough for my unmasked system to safely survive it.
    I am sharing this to show that our legal levers are not just abstract ideas—they are highly functional shields when tailored to our exact biological boundaries. I am slowly compiling these real-world workarounds and personal insights as part of a larger project titled "The Late-Diagnosed Reclamation Toolkit: A Somatic, Structural, and Molecular Safety Manual for Autistic Burnout," which I hope to find a way to safely and respectfully share more widely once my engine has fully healed.
    Best wishes,
    Phased
    (Note for transparency and forum guidelines: I am sharing these scientific reflections, somatic tracking methods, and personal administrative workarounds purely as an autobiographical record of my own health journey and mutual peer support. These insights are strictly personal and are not intended to serve as medical or legal advice. Always seek independent professional guidance regarding medical diagnostics, medication titration, or statutory legal matters.)
  • in reply to Alexa

    Me too I find it totally jarring, unless part of the plot involves them having a breakdown or something.

  • in reply to Alexa

    Thanks  

    I possibly naively hold on to the hope that if 50% of those 50% more enquiries result in a 50% improvement in health that's a 12.5% reduction in the actual need for overall staff time!  

    The thing is that I and others are not enquiring - like what time is the latest train - I'm making formal inquiries about my health and the provision for it.  I figure that if the system can't handle that then it's maybe not formally fit for purpose.

    I will keep you and others reading this posted.

    Best Wishes

  • in reply to TheCatWoman
    TheCatWoman said:
    I think a lot of writers find their characters take on a life of thier own and have a say in whats happening to them.

    Oh, they do. A character comes to life while being written and, thereafter, will reject some things I want them to do or make them say, because it doesn't really fit them.

    One thing (among many) that writing has given me is a profound loathing of movies/TV series where the character acts out-of-character for the plot. To me, the writer has just made that character meaningless. S/he may as well have inserted Lego figures.

  • in reply to Alexa

    I'm always amazed when authors say they've planed a series of so many books, I've not idea of how they do it.

    I guess it can be a bit of a job keeping all the timelines, histories etc in order, I hate when I read books and these are all muddled. I think a lot of writers find their characters take on a life of thier own and have a say in whats happening to them.

    I've never been a story writer, people are always surprised because I read so much fiction, I have tried but always run out of steam after a few paragraphs. I learn essay writing on the job as it were when I was at uni, I really had no idea of what I was doing, luckily I picked it up quite quickly.

  • in reply to Phased

    Good luck! 

    My GP practice set up an email system for patients and it broke almost immediately. They had to withdraw it because it generated 50% more enquiries, which they didn't have the staff to handle. I'll be very interested in the outcome of your battle to be written transactions only.

  • in reply to Phased
    Hi everyone,
    I wanted to share a real-time update on how this "legal lever" approach just played out in practice this morning, in case the mechanical reality of navigating the maze is helpful to anyone else tracking this thread.
    Within an hour of submitting my ultra-short, highly condensed online portal message—which explicitly focused on the clinical instability of my right upper quadrant pain and referenced my right to a written "reasonable adjustment" due to autistic burnout—the surgery's administrative freeze broke. I received an automated notification confirming that my case has been formally triaged and that a dedicated appointment has been booked for this Wednesday for the GP to review my request.
    The notification came with the standard boilerplate template stating, "You will be contacted via phone or message that day." Initially, I felt a massive surge of frustration and anger that my explicit request for text-only communication appeared to be ignored by the system. It felt like standard, passive-aggressive institutional blindness.
    However, once I took a step back to look at the machinery of the NHS IT setup, I recognised that the text was just an automated software template generated by a clerk assigning a time slot, rather than a human actively rejecting my needs. What I read was just "machine noise" generated by computer software and someone unable to look at the full picture to give me an answer.  They literal haven't even read the full text of my submission(s) to them.
    Because my metabolic battery is completely flat and I cannot handle the sensory load of a live phone call, I have decided how I will personally enforce my legal boundary this Wednesday. If the GP calls my phone, I will simply choose not to answer it and let it go straight to voicemail.
    By using the physical hardware of my phone as a gatekeeper, I am allowing their own administrative protocol to work for me. When a doctor hits a voicemail on a booked clinical slot, they are required to open the electronic patient file to see what the appointment is regarding. The moment he does that, the very first thing he will encounter on my file is my explicit, documented portal request outlining my executive burnout and my need for a written decision on my ultrasound referral.
    For me, this has been a profound lesson in stopping the urge to argue with the machine. I don't need to call them back to fix their automated templates. I am just letting my written signposts do the talking while I protect my remaining baseline energy on the floor.
    Best wishes,
    Phased
  • in reply to TheCatWoman
    Hi everyone,
    I wanted to circle back and say a thank you to @The CatWoman and @Alexa for sharing your experiences, and to acknowledge Suzanne Mod's important reminder about keeping our discussions within the safety of the forum guidelines. It is actually a perfect real-world example of the exact structural boundaries we are trying to map here.
    TheCatWoman, your description of the shift in pain clinics—from comprehensive, multi-disciplinary care to fragmented, passive-aggressive "social prescribing"—hits the nail on the head. That administrative shrug of "what do you expect us to do?" is the ultimate modern manifestation of the Prefecture in The Twelve Tasks of Asterix. It is an institutional tactic designed to exhaust a hyper-sensitive, burnt-out system until the individual simply gives up and walks away.
    When I let a bit of my own raw frustration leak out in my last post, it was precisely because of that stifling sensation. When you are qualified to understand the mechanics of your own body, being treated like a passive, unreasonable compliance problem by a rigid system is incredibly activating. It triggers that intense, hair-trigger survival response.
    TheCatWoman, thank you so much for your kind wishes regarding my treatment. It is an absolute maze to navigate. Just this morning, I had to orchestrate a highly strategic "chase-up" through my surgery’s online portal because my formal letters had been met with complete administrative silence. In an overtaxed NHS system, long, detailed clinical histories often get filed away in the "too difficult" box.
    But this is exactly where the strategy of the "legal lever" has become my own best defensive tool. I don't want to break the site rules by swapping medical prescriptions or alternative remedy lists, nor do I intend to waste my volatile, scarce energy trying to argue with or change the administrative gatekeepers.
    Instead, I have chosen to look at the structural hardware that is already sitting quietly in the background. To break my own surgery freeze today, I didn't try to call and manage an exhausting, spontaneous conversation. I stripped my communication down to bare, ultra-short, undeniable clinical signposts. I personally used the statutory framework of the Equality Act to formally request a "reasonable adjustment" to conduct my clinical management plan with my GP team strictly in writing, prioritising an urgent diagnostic ultrasound referral to safely clear my physical symptoms before starting any new medication.
    By shifting my conversation onto objective, documented legal ground, the passive-aggressive administrative barrier instantly changes shape. I am hoping that the system is forced to pause, process the data, and log the request properly on my file.
    My own library of survival tools isn't about finding a magic cure or breaking regulations. For me, it is about learning how to stop absorbing institutional failure as a personal defect, recognizing when my battery is flat, and using the existing rules of the game as a shield to protect my baseline so I can safely navigate my way back home.
    Best wishes,
    Phased
  • in reply to TheCatWoman

    Reminder of rule 6 No medical or legal advice.  Always seek professional help for these matters.