• Replies 35 replies
  • Subscribers 98 subscribers
  • Views 976 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Unaffordable TV

TheCatWoman

I've asked AI how much it would cost to have all the common streaming channels and the answer is £120 per month minimum, that dosent' include Sky, the licence fee or any sporting channels which would add another £30-50 a month.

Given how much rubbish there is on terrestial channels, especially now with all the football and the knock on effects of how much less funding there will be for other programing, is this a hidden part of the cost of living?

I don't have any of the streaming channels or Sky and signing up to them would make a serious dent in my finances, how do people afford them and are they worth it? DO you only really use them for one big series each like GoT?

Parents
  • TheCatWoman said:
    is this a hidden part of the cost of living?

    It is far from a cost of living. It is an entertainment option - a luxury and something you don't "need".

    I use methods I can't discuss here to obtain the series or films I want to watch (many are not available on local services or are geo-blocked from my region anyway) but most of my casual entertainment is from YouTube where I follow a range of channels on my special interests and there is often plenty to choose from.

    With YouTube there are simple ways to avoid the adverts which have been discussed on other threads here before and this makes it altogether more pleasant. If you don't have good internet access so get low quality of buffering then you can download the videos to watch offline using other processes that are free.

    There are sites like the Internet Archive that have loads of old TV series that are not being broadcast anymore plus millions of other random bits of old TV if this takes your interest. 

    It isn't complex to have a load of entertainment options on zero budget and still be legal with them all. You won't have the latest but when you work out the price per year then it puts it in context - it is just an expensive luxury. 

Reply
  • TheCatWoman said:
    is this a hidden part of the cost of living?

    It is far from a cost of living. It is an entertainment option - a luxury and something you don't "need".

    I use methods I can't discuss here to obtain the series or films I want to watch (many are not available on local services or are geo-blocked from my region anyway) but most of my casual entertainment is from YouTube where I follow a range of channels on my special interests and there is often plenty to choose from.

    With YouTube there are simple ways to avoid the adverts which have been discussed on other threads here before and this makes it altogether more pleasant. If you don't have good internet access so get low quality of buffering then you can download the videos to watch offline using other processes that are free.

    There are sites like the Internet Archive that have loads of old TV series that are not being broadcast anymore plus millions of other random bits of old TV if this takes your interest. 

    It isn't complex to have a load of entertainment options on zero budget and still be legal with them all. You won't have the latest but when you work out the price per year then it puts it in context - it is just an expensive luxury. 

Children
  • in reply to Iain

    Regarding being a luxury... Things like Satellite/Cable/Netflix/etc probably are. But a TV licence and the cost of the TV itself tend to be considered somewhat essential. For instance, if you put a claim in for free NHS services (known as an HC2 certificate), they compare your income to what they call "requirements". 

    Requirements include council tax, housing costs which are not covered by benefits, and "personal allowances". Personal allowances include water/fuel bills, telephone, insurance, and "TV rental".

    [source: HC1 application form]

    Do bare in mind that we have the BBC here which has a duty to try and cater to as many different people as possible, as well as providing impartial news (which may not be applicable in other countries).

    I maintain that TV isn't as good as it used to be but if you don't have internet (or can't access it or use it), an inexpensive TV and a license would be an important source of information.

    The cost of a TV licence has come down in real terms. In 2006 a colour licence was £126.50. Accounting for inflation, that is the equivalent of about £225 today, yet a licence now is only £180.

  • in reply to Iain

    You don't live in the UK though do you Iain? TV might technically be a luxury, but for many it's essential, especially if you have kids, are housebound or elderly, it can literally be your window onto the world.

    I've looked through the tv pages and found an incredible number of repeats, the same three or programes being played all day. It all looks to be an incredible waste of money.

    I don't use youtube I'm told you can get around the ads, but I don't know how, thats a level of techinical wizzardry above my very basic knowlege