Is the concept of masking accurate or useful?

I am increasingly convinced that the concept of masking is fundamentally flawed and is actually detrimental.

Masking posits the idea that the autistic person who tries to function in allistic society is assuming a different and false personality - a mask - in order to do so. 

My thinking is that this is not at all helpful. Humans are highly social animals and all humans need to be able to communicate accurately and effectively in order to function in a hugely complex society. Autistic humans need to do this just as much as any others, but they have an impairment. While allistics absorb and master all the subtleties of interpersonal communication by subconscious processes during childhood development, autistics do not to the same extent. Allistics then express this ability throughout life with no conscious effort. In contrast, to a greater or lesser extent, autistic people both master in childhood and then use throughout their lives, interpersonal communication skills that are based on conscious observation and emulation and are largely dependent on the use of the intellect.

The autistic person using these communication skills - which may be less effective than those subconscious skills used by allistics - is not adopting a different personality, they are just employing hard-won abilities. It is the immense intellectual investment that makes using these communication skills exhausting and can lead to anxiety and autistic burnout. The autistic person using allistic-style communication skills is the same person, with the same personality, as when they are not. They are not wearing a mask.

When autistics communicate with other autistics, or with allistics who are used to autistic styles of communication, it is much more straightforward and easy, not because they are being 'more authentic', or 'maskless', they are just not having to work as hard.

Parents
  • Masking is one of the three parts of camouflaging. You can Google the others 

    I did it much more when younger and it was tiring, inauthentic, awkward, led to depression and burnout and was contributory in the loss of my relationship. It also meant I was unnoticed and was also advised wrongly.

    The more comfortable and familiar you are with a situation the less you do it I think, or the less effortful. So if you stick to the same places, people and routines, you may not be doing it much or expending much effort if it is then embedded. I think it feels like it decreases as you get older because you become more familiar with what to do, the anxiety drops and you are more natural. Until you are put in a novel situation or are under pressure again.

    I think the concept is useful. It captures the fact that fitting in is effortful and not Intrinsic. It also helps to explain the feeling of not fitting in even when you appear to others to fit in. It also helps to explain people pleasing and limited boundaries plus the propensity for people watching, and the feeling of being lost when asked to improvise and fear of mistakes, hence the preparation, overthinking, replaying conversations excessively, scripting, etc.

    What it doesn't mean is you are acting and there is a whole different person underneath waiting to get out. It basically just means you need to relax a bit more, which is hard when your nervous system sensitivity is turned up 

  • Masking is one of the three parts of camouflaging. You can Google the others 

    It's perhaps worth noting that, in general, the autistic community tends to use the broader umbrella term "masking" to cover the whole cluster of behaviours that the CAT-Q psychometric framework splits into three components: compensation, masking, and assimilation.

    This is reflected in the NAS's masking article, where the examples given in the bullet-point list span all three components:

    NAS - Masking

Reply
  • Masking is one of the three parts of camouflaging. You can Google the others 

    It's perhaps worth noting that, in general, the autistic community tends to use the broader umbrella term "masking" to cover the whole cluster of behaviours that the CAT-Q psychometric framework splits into three components: compensation, masking, and assimilation.

    This is reflected in the NAS's masking article, where the examples given in the bullet-point list span all three components:

    NAS - Masking

Children
No Data