Autism diagnosis test places.

what’s the best place to get a autism diagnosis test? Not everywhere is the same. Is there any better places to go in Scotland as it costs a out of money 

Parents
  • In addition to comments below, it would be advisable to ask if the assessment would be completed by a multidisciplinary team. NICE guidelines specify this. 

  • This isn’t a hard rule, it states where available. Usually children get this or any other NHS assessment (if you don’t retire before you get seen). NHS is based around MDT.  

    A single experienced consultant psychiatrist (or clinical psychologist) who:

    • is trained in adult autism
    • uses DSM-5 / ICD-11
    • takes a detailed developmental history
    • uses validated tools (AQ, RAADS-R, etc.)
    • gathers informant input
    • rules out differential diagnoses
    • documents impairment and reasoning

    this is sufficient, valid, fits NICE criteria and is 99% of private assessments. Mine was done by a leading psychiatrist in the field at NHS South London and Maudsley which are also home to some of the top consultants in the world, but also sees people privately. It was accepted by my GP and is my medical record. I don’t want people thinking if it’s not MDT led then it’s invalid as that’s not the case. Your comment infers that, at least that’s what I taken from it. 

    www.nice.org.uk/.../Recommendations

  • The ‘gold standard’ according to NICE guidelines is for the assessment to be conducted by a multi disciplinary team of appropriate professionals. This is shown in the link you have provided and I have copied the relevant section.

    In my area, the GPs accepted private diagnosis only if the assessment was conducted according to these guidelines. 

    Here is a section of the NICE guidelines from the link you provided:

    Structures for the organisation and delivery of care and interventions

    1.1.12

    In order to effectively provide care and support for autistic adults, the local autism multi-agency strategy group should include representation from managers, commissioners and clinicians from adult services, including mental health, learning disability, primary healthcare, social care, housing, educational and employment services, the criminal justice system and the third sector. There should be meaningful representation from autistic people and their families, partners and carers.

    1.1.13

    In each area a specialist community-based multidisciplinary team for autistic adults (the specialist autism team) should be established. The membership should include:

    • psychologists with training and experience in working with autistic adults

    • nurses

    • occupational therapists

    • psychiatrists

    • social workers

    • speech and language therapists

    • support staff (for example, staff supporting access to housing, educational and employment services, financial advice, and personal and community safety skills).

    1.1.14

    The specialist autism team should have a key role in the delivery and coordination of:

    • specialist diagnostic and assessment services

    • specialist care and interventions

    • advice and training to other health and social care professionals on the diagnosis, assessment, care and interventions for autistic adults (as not all may be in the care of a specialist team)

    • support in accessing, and maintaining contact with, housing, educational and employment services

    • support to families, partners and carers where appropriate

    • care and interventions for autistic adults living in specialist residential accommodation

    • training, support and consultation for staff who care for autistic adults in residential and community settings.

  • We are all autistic so fully understanding what is meant by the guidelines and what is needed can be import to us. So I hope no one is taking it personally, (it gave me major anxiety all night), especially understanding why some have maybe paid for a bigger assessment with an in person part, but same results at the end of the day really.  This is why ideally, it would be better to be able to have it at least through the NHS even if it was paying for a set thing for a set price like the dentist. I hate the privatisation model

    I am sorry that you had anxiety all night about this and I agree that it is a sad system when getting a diagnosis can be such a life saver for many people. There is a dreadful amount of inequality from region to region and within regions with regard to autism diagnosis and in other specialisms. From posts here, many people in England have had fast diagnosis through ‘Right to Choose’, although somebody recently mentioned an over one year waiting list for assessment. A year ago, N. Ireland waiting lists in my region were over 4 years long and I think I saw a post stating a region of Scotland has stopped assessments altogether. 

    there is growing toxicity around getting assessed currently

    That is the worrying thing and that causes me anxiety. If society invalidates us more than it does already, where does that leave us? Like many, I am very late diagnosed (60s) and words are inadequate to convey what it did for me. It is an understatement simply to say that since diagnosis, my mental health has never been better.

  • It given me major anxiety too and lost a whole night of sleep over this. I would encourage you to speak to your GP as I did this morning and the psychiatrist team - I’m told that as long as the criteria used are inline with the recommended assessment criteria than there should be no reason for your medical record not to be updated. This reassured me, however, I do suspect there may be some bureaucracy at play as others have said. 

  • I think you've hit on the main issue, that it will depend on the interpretation of the guidelines and knowledge of your GP.

    I haven't spoken to mine to find out if they accepted it or not, I am afraid to. Last time I was there I didn't know anything about autism bar the stereotypes, and I sat there looking at the wall and wringing my hands as I talked, and I think he just thought I was stressed as that was what I was sort of there about. So that makes me think they don't know anything about it, as I can look back and see the signs were all there.

    We are all autistic so fully understanding what is meant by the guidelines and what is needed can be import to us. So I hope no one is taking it personally, (it gave me major anxiety all night), especially understanding why some have maybe paid for a bigger assessment with an in person part, but same results at the end of the day really.  This is why ideally, it would be better to be able to have it at least through the NHS even if it was paying for a set thing for a set price like the dentist. I hate the privatisation model.

    I think it is important to know and get diagnosed if you need it for self understanding, as it could even save your life knowing why you struggle and finding language to talk about it, but there is growing toxicity around getting assessed currently which I think will take it away from people and make it something you only get if you can afford it. 

    It's a sad system. It all is currently. 
    I can fully see why you would just self-determine austism and not have to touch the system.

  • I don’t know if GPs are individually allowed to choose what they will accept, or if it comes from higher up within each individual country.

    I wondered that too.

Reply Children
  • We are all autistic so fully understanding what is meant by the guidelines and what is needed can be import to us. So I hope no one is taking it personally, (it gave me major anxiety all night), especially understanding why some have maybe paid for a bigger assessment with an in person part, but same results at the end of the day really.  This is why ideally, it would be better to be able to have it at least through the NHS even if it was paying for a set thing for a set price like the dentist. I hate the privatisation model

    I am sorry that you had anxiety all night about this and I agree that it is a sad system when getting a diagnosis can be such a life saver for many people. There is a dreadful amount of inequality from region to region and within regions with regard to autism diagnosis and in other specialisms. From posts here, many people in England have had fast diagnosis through ‘Right to Choose’, although somebody recently mentioned an over one year waiting list for assessment. A year ago, N. Ireland waiting lists in my region were over 4 years long and I think I saw a post stating a region of Scotland has stopped assessments altogether. 

    there is growing toxicity around getting assessed currently

    That is the worrying thing and that causes me anxiety. If society invalidates us more than it does already, where does that leave us? Like many, I am very late diagnosed (60s) and words are inadequate to convey what it did for me. It is an understatement simply to say that since diagnosis, my mental health has never been better.

  • It given me major anxiety too and lost a whole night of sleep over this. I would encourage you to speak to your GP as I did this morning and the psychiatrist team - I’m told that as long as the criteria used are inline with the recommended assessment criteria than there should be no reason for your medical record not to be updated. This reassured me, however, I do suspect there may be some bureaucracy at play as others have said. 

  • I think you've hit on the main issue, that it will depend on the interpretation of the guidelines and knowledge of your GP.

    I haven't spoken to mine to find out if they accepted it or not, I am afraid to. Last time I was there I didn't know anything about autism bar the stereotypes, and I sat there looking at the wall and wringing my hands as I talked, and I think he just thought I was stressed as that was what I was sort of there about. So that makes me think they don't know anything about it, as I can look back and see the signs were all there.

    We are all autistic so fully understanding what is meant by the guidelines and what is needed can be import to us. So I hope no one is taking it personally, (it gave me major anxiety all night), especially understanding why some have maybe paid for a bigger assessment with an in person part, but same results at the end of the day really.  This is why ideally, it would be better to be able to have it at least through the NHS even if it was paying for a set thing for a set price like the dentist. I hate the privatisation model.

    I think it is important to know and get diagnosed if you need it for self understanding, as it could even save your life knowing why you struggle and finding language to talk about it, but there is growing toxicity around getting assessed currently which I think will take it away from people and make it something you only get if you can afford it. 

    It's a sad system. It all is currently. 
    I can fully see why you would just self-determine austism and not have to touch the system.