Benefits are a positive??

So i asked google AI how much of the Benefit bill goes back into the Economy and basically all of it does.
I wonder if politicians know the impact of benefit cuts have on the wider economy since virtually none of the money is saved..
Can anyone confirm this? is the AI wrong?
The total amount of the UK benefits bill that goes back into the economy is 
nearly the entire initial sum, which is forecast to be approximately £313 billion for the 2024/25 financial year. 
This initial amount immediately re-enters the economy as spending on essential goods and services, and the total economic impact is higher due to a significant multiplier effect.
Breakdown of the Economic Flow (in Pounds)
For the 2024/25 period, the approximate flow of funds is as follows:
Description  Amount in Pounds (approx) Citation/Explanation
Total Welfare Bill (2024/25) £313 billion
Initial Amount Spent in Economy ~£313 billion (nearly 100%) Recipients typically spend all of this on necessities like food and housing.
Total Economic Impact (Multiplier) ~£532.1 billion Based on an estimated economic multiplier of 1.7.
The rapid circulation of these funds means:
  • High Spending Rate: Benefit recipients typically have a very high marginal propensity to consume (MPC), meaning they spend the money quickly on rent, food, and utilities, rather than saving it.
  • Multiplier Effect: This spending supports local jobs and businesses, generating secondary economic activity. Analysis suggests every £1 spent in social security can generate as much as £1.70 in total local economic impact (a multiplier of 1.7). 
The government's total expenditure on social protection for 2024/25 was around £384 billion (a slightly broader measure including things like DWP running costs). The £313 billion figure represents the direct benefit payments themselves
Parents
  • A good post - thanks for sharing this. In essence, benefits actually mainly benefit landlords and the shareholders of utility companies, pharmaceutical companies, and supermarkets.

    The thing that bugs me when the total benefits bill is reported on is that it includes state pensions. But most people getting state pensions paid NI all their working lives and pensions are taxable income, which other benefits are not. So I don't feel it should be classed as a "benefit".It's a pension, just like private or work pensions.

    By the way, I'm aware that the government use the taxes & NI from current workers to pay for state pensions, but that's the way it's always been. By contributing during your working life to the pensions of older people, you then gain the right to your own pension when you retire. The government really should have taken contributions from workers and put them into a proper government pension scheme from the start, but then it would have taken much longer to be able to start giving people a state pension.

  • Yeah no one mentions the pensions that take up a lot of the benefits bill which the majority has paid into.. I wonder if companies such as scope and NAS should campaign to highlight this and maybe reframe it

Reply Children
No Data