• Replies 7 replies
  • Subscribers 84 subscribers
  • Views 329 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Mind-Blindness, Cassandra Syndrome, and Neurodiverse Relationships

KopiKestrel

Hi everyone,

(I also posted this on reddit. I'm trying to find an autistic community that I can feel safe having these conversations)

I'm hoping to get your thoughts on the ideas of mind-blindness and Cassandra Syndrome. How have you successfully navigated these challenges in a relationship? 

I'm struggling to find constructive ways forward with my partner because of conflicting information we're finding online. My partner is finding resources and articles that directly contradict both my lived experience as an autistic person and the guidance I'm receiving from my therapist.

I'm hoping to hear your advice on how you've successfully navigated these challenges and pushed back against harmful stereotypes. The core conflicts we keep running into boil down to two specific ideas:

  • The assumption that autistic individuals have fundamentally different emotional and relational needs compared to non-autistic people (e.g. less emotional needs).
  • The idea that Cassandra Syndrome is an experience exclusively limited to the non-autistic partner.

I want to be perfectly clear: The pain caused by communication differences in a neurodiverse relationship affect both partners. The problem is that these false assumptions perpetuate harmful stereotypes that only increase the pain.

For context, here are some of the types of online sources that I believe are disseminating misleading information:

Parents

  • I recommend starting by eliminating outdated stereotypes. Make this a joint discovery session with your partner. You are different, not broken.

    The “Mind-Blindness” Myth     This comes from the “Theory of Mind” deficit model - the idea that autistic people can’t understand that others have different thoughts, beliefs, and intentions. This was based on flawed research (like the Sally-Anne test) that measured neurotypical social performance rather than actual understanding. Modern research shows autistic people do understand others have different perspectives - we just might express or demonstrate that understanding differently. 
    The “Emotionless/Unempathetic” Stereotype The idea that autistic people lack empathy or emotional understanding. In reality, many autistic people experience hyper-empathy - feeling others’ emotions intensely. What may differ is expressing empathy in neurotypical-expected ways or managing emotional overwhelm.
    The “Literal Thinker” Overgeneralization While some autistic people prefer direct communication, this gets weaponized to suggest autistic people can’t understand nuance, metaphor, sarcasm, or subtext. Many autistic people are highly skilled with language complexity, abstract thinking, and detecting incongruence between what’s said and meant.
    The “Deficit” Model Overall Framing autism as a collection of things you can’t do rather than different neurological wiring that processes information differently. This positions neurotypical processing as correct/superior and autistic processing as broken/inferior.
    The “Can’t Learn Social Skills” Assumption The idea that autistic people are permanently stuck not understanding social dynamics. Many autistic people become extremely sophisticated social analysts - we just might learn through pattern observation rather than intuitive absorption.

    The Social Model of Disability & Neurodiversity Paradigm

    Walker, N. (2021). “Neurodiversity: Some Basic Terms & Definitions.”
    • Defines the neurodiversity paradigm as viewing neurological differences as natural variations rather than deficits
    • Available at neuroqueer.com (Walker is an autistic scholar and leading voice in neurodiversity studies)
    Chapman, R. (2020). “The reality of autism: On the metaphysics of disorder and diversity.” Philosophical Psychology, 33(6), 799-819.
    • Argues autism is better understood as difference rather than disorder
    • Examines how the “disorder” framing is socially constructed
    Singer, J. (1998). “Odd People In: The Birth of Community Amongst People on the Autism Spectrum” (Honors thesis, University of Technology Sydney)
    • Coined the term “neurodiversity”
    • Foundational text arguing for autism as natural variation

    The Double Empathy Problem

    Milton, D. E. (2012). “On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem’.” Disability & Society, 27(6), 883-887.
    • Groundbreaking research showing communication breakdown between autistic and non-autistic people goes both ways
    • Challenges the idea that only autistic people have social/empathy deficits
    Crompton, C. J., et al. (2020). “Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective.” Autism, 24(7), 1704-1712.
    • Demonstrated autistic people communicate very effectively with each other
    • Problems arise in mixed neurotype groups, not within autistic groups

    Theory of Mind Reconsidered

    Gernsbacher, M. A., & Yergeau, M. (2019). “Empirical failures of the claim that autistic people lack a theory of mind.” Archives of Scientific Psychology, 7(1), 102-118.
    • Comprehensive review showing Theory of Mind tests are culturally biased and don’t measure actual understanding
    • Autistic researchers challenging the “mind-blindness” narrative
    Pearson, A., et al. (2022). “Mental state understanding in autism: A systematic review.” Psychological Bulletin, 148(7-8), 557-595.
    • Meta-analysis showing autistic people’s Theory of Mind abilities are more nuanced than previously thought
    • Context and task demands matter more than inherent deficits

Reply

  • I recommend starting by eliminating outdated stereotypes. Make this a joint discovery session with your partner. You are different, not broken.

    The “Mind-Blindness” Myth     This comes from the “Theory of Mind” deficit model - the idea that autistic people can’t understand that others have different thoughts, beliefs, and intentions. This was based on flawed research (like the Sally-Anne test) that measured neurotypical social performance rather than actual understanding. Modern research shows autistic people do understand others have different perspectives - we just might express or demonstrate that understanding differently. 
    The “Emotionless/Unempathetic” Stereotype The idea that autistic people lack empathy or emotional understanding. In reality, many autistic people experience hyper-empathy - feeling others’ emotions intensely. What may differ is expressing empathy in neurotypical-expected ways or managing emotional overwhelm.
    The “Literal Thinker” Overgeneralization While some autistic people prefer direct communication, this gets weaponized to suggest autistic people can’t understand nuance, metaphor, sarcasm, or subtext. Many autistic people are highly skilled with language complexity, abstract thinking, and detecting incongruence between what’s said and meant.
    The “Deficit” Model Overall Framing autism as a collection of things you can’t do rather than different neurological wiring that processes information differently. This positions neurotypical processing as correct/superior and autistic processing as broken/inferior.
    The “Can’t Learn Social Skills” Assumption The idea that autistic people are permanently stuck not understanding social dynamics. Many autistic people become extremely sophisticated social analysts - we just might learn through pattern observation rather than intuitive absorption.

    The Social Model of Disability & Neurodiversity Paradigm

    Walker, N. (2021). “Neurodiversity: Some Basic Terms & Definitions.”
    • Defines the neurodiversity paradigm as viewing neurological differences as natural variations rather than deficits
    • Available at neuroqueer.com (Walker is an autistic scholar and leading voice in neurodiversity studies)
    Chapman, R. (2020). “The reality of autism: On the metaphysics of disorder and diversity.” Philosophical Psychology, 33(6), 799-819.
    • Argues autism is better understood as difference rather than disorder
    • Examines how the “disorder” framing is socially constructed
    Singer, J. (1998). “Odd People In: The Birth of Community Amongst People on the Autism Spectrum” (Honors thesis, University of Technology Sydney)
    • Coined the term “neurodiversity”
    • Foundational text arguing for autism as natural variation

    The Double Empathy Problem

    Milton, D. E. (2012). “On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem’.” Disability & Society, 27(6), 883-887.
    • Groundbreaking research showing communication breakdown between autistic and non-autistic people goes both ways
    • Challenges the idea that only autistic people have social/empathy deficits
    Crompton, C. J., et al. (2020). “Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective.” Autism, 24(7), 1704-1712.
    • Demonstrated autistic people communicate very effectively with each other
    • Problems arise in mixed neurotype groups, not within autistic groups

    Theory of Mind Reconsidered

    Gernsbacher, M. A., & Yergeau, M. (2019). “Empirical failures of the claim that autistic people lack a theory of mind.” Archives of Scientific Psychology, 7(1), 102-118.
    • Comprehensive review showing Theory of Mind tests are culturally biased and don’t measure actual understanding
    • Autistic researchers challenging the “mind-blindness” narrative
    Pearson, A., et al. (2022). “Mental state understanding in autism: A systematic review.” Psychological Bulletin, 148(7-8), 557-595.
    • Meta-analysis showing autistic people’s Theory of Mind abilities are more nuanced than previously thought
    • Context and task demands matter more than inherent deficits

Children