Anyone else find terms used by mental health professionals offensive?

I was thinking about the labels given to those with mental health struggles. Previously I have been told I had an Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder, and am currently considered by the secondary mental health team to be on the spectrum with an Autism Spectrum Disorder, I have issues with the term Disorder. To me it implies that we are broken or wrong to think in the way we do. Given the diabolical state of the world at the moment, what is so great about being and thinking like a neurotypical person. 

More recently I have been reading up about the diagnostic assessment process, and the need for Informants. To me this language invokes overtones of criminality or worse of an oligarchic state and its secret police. I mentioned this to my wife and a couple of friends, and they too were horrified by the term Informant! 

Surely the Neurodivergent community deserves more respect. Derogatory language (disorder, informant) is in my opinion offensive and shows a lack of respect from those working in the mental health arena. The language used in any dialogue is, in my opinion, so important in establishing the tone and nature of any interaction.

I am interested in your views on the subject.

Parents
  • Yes, it feels offensive because autism is a unique way of being and it is a spectrum which manifests in different ways. Unfortunately, until Psychiatrists can better reflect and agree on an appropriate name for autism, we are stuck with disorder. 

    The link describes the differences between syndrome, disorder and disease https://psychologyfor.com/the-differences-between-syndrome-disorder-and-disease/

    Some people prefer to call autism ASC, but I don’t like that as it would feel like a condition I am lumbered with, such as an illness. That is because a condition is something some people have, not something they are. 

    Syndrome sounds better to my ears, but the first link shows why this doesn’t fit. 

    AS (Autistic Spectrum) is great, but that could be problematic as it wouldn’t fit in the existing classifications in the DSM (Second link), it would be returned to the list of disorders. 

    The problem remains that although I am not a condition, I don’t have a condition, and I am not conditioned (unless I increase fitness), I can have a disorder, be a disorder and be disordered  (according to ASD definition), although I don’t identify with those terms.

    I prefer to say I am autistic, and in that way I avoid calling myself disordered or conditioned, or saying I have a disorder or condition. 

    This links to the ‘Book of Disorders’ otherwise known as the DSM https://www.psychiatryonline.org/dsm. To read, you would need to purchase unless you can access it through a library or university.

    in the meantime, I am autistic, other people are non-autistic and if pushed I will agree that the majority of people are not neurodivergent. 

  • I think this shows where the problem lies though. Some are happy with it being called a disorder, some prefer condition, you prefer neither. Whatever they call it, somebody will be unhappy with it. And I'm not sure theres a solution to that problem.

  • Exactly! It is unlikely that universal satisfaction can be achieved. 

Reply Children
No Data