• Replies 5 replies
  • Subscribers 80 subscribers
  • Views 166 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Different levels?

andi

Hi 

I’m confused by these levels, I’m assuming they are relatively new…

I guess generally I’m a level 1 but I feel like I cross the line into level 2 but I’m so confused Sweat smile I heavily mask but people still notice that I have differences to what is considered “normal” 

im moving into to own home for the first time where I’ll be living on my own (which I’ve never done before so I am so so nervous but I am excited too) I guess ill see what level  fit into when I move? 

does anything really define the levels or do you only fit into one? 

Parents

  • The levels are defined around the amount of support you require (minimal, substantial, very substantial) 

    If someone has assessed you as able to move into your own home you'd be generally level 1, excepting some supported living arrangements. 

    I tend to think these levels are there more for assessment purposes, for those who allot care packages and the like - rather than those who are in receipt of anything to try to interpret.  I am being a touch cynical though. 

    I guess if your new home wasn't supported living, and you'd been assessed as level 2, then it would be unsuitable for you - so there's a method here.  

    Going right off at a tangent - I feel we all (in the ASD community) require some support sometimes, but wouldn't necessarily meet the criteria even for level 1.  What level would some of us then be?   This is why I don't like categorising people in this way.  In some respects it seems to invalidate their ASD in a way.  

    Having said this - many of us have tried getting even minimal support, and find it just isn't there when needed.  


    I think your question actually opens up more questions - and I guess people can be borderline, by these definitions. 

  • in reply to overwhelmed & underwhelmed ( O & U )

    I got diagnosed before the levels were a common thing, where it was still called Asperger’s, HFA ect. Rather than using autism as an overall umbrella diagnosis. 

    this is kind of why I asked the question these 3 levels don’t seem to take into account that people’s needs are changing day to day depending on circumstances. As it’s autism awareness month I’ve just been seeing everywhere. It just led to my thought going to places that’s all.

    i didn’t mean to offend anyone if i did 

Reply
  • in reply to overwhelmed & underwhelmed ( O & U )

    I got diagnosed before the levels were a common thing, where it was still called Asperger’s, HFA ect. Rather than using autism as an overall umbrella diagnosis. 

    this is kind of why I asked the question these 3 levels don’t seem to take into account that people’s needs are changing day to day depending on circumstances. As it’s autism awareness month I’ve just been seeing everywhere. It just led to my thought going to places that’s all.

    i didn’t mean to offend anyone if i did 

Children
  • in reply to andi

         

    You didn't offend me.  I'd prefer the old terminology was still used myself, and the fact there has to be these subsections of ASD to cover some but not all in-part shows why it was not wise (in my opinion) to call everyone Autistic in the first place. 

    Nobody polled those with Autism before making the change, did they ?

    That said.  I think these levels (above) are broad enough to be a general guide for categorising individuals in terms of the help they may require.  Even if some may be 1/2 or 2/3.   As I said before, I feel they are for the benefit of social care professionals, not for those with ASD.