• Replies 32 replies
  • Subscribers 93 subscribers
  • Views 2075 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Not autistic diagnosis

notthatmuchautistic

Hello,

This morning I have my diagnosis from NHS. they told me that while I have autistic traits and they understand why I would pursuit an assessment, I didn't  make the criteria for a diagnosis, they mention specially my empathy and my facial expressions, that are normal.

I don't  know how to feel. I have a child with autism and our similarities was what made me search for an evaluation.

At the moment, I have some accommodations at my job that are in place under the premise that I am undergoing the process of autism diagnosis. Those adaptations have made my life much easier  and I don't  want to cry every day when I am going to my job (like before).

I am guessing  that once my job knows that I don't  have autism I am losing  that help and I don't  know what to do.

I don't  want to be the kind of person that take advantage  of the system and have benefits  that doesn't  need, but I do struggle and now I don't know what to do next.

I hope this post doesn't  offend people with autism, I know this forum  is for the autistic community and I am not sure if I should  post.

Parents

  • There was a thread a while back which raised the issue about there now being a subcategory of people with autistic traits, but who don't actually meet the criteria for being autistic. 

    There is always the suspicion that it's more about the government wanting to save money by disqualifying  some individuals deemed as not being in need of support at work etc.

    You might want to try elsewhere for a diagnosis, though I've heard that going private may be expensive. 

Reply

  • There was a thread a while back which raised the issue about there now being a subcategory of people with autistic traits, but who don't actually meet the criteria for being autistic. 

    There is always the suspicion that it's more about the government wanting to save money by disqualifying  some individuals deemed as not being in need of support at work etc.

    You might want to try elsewhere for a diagnosis, though I've heard that going private may be expensive. 

Children
No Data