What does autism acceptance mean to you?
What does autism acceptance mean to you?
For me it is about normalising difference.
The representation of autism in media has meant that stereotypes exist. But these are damaging to not only those on the spectrum but also the opinions and prejudices of those in society who remain ignorant to what autism really is. The programmes Chris Packham has led in the past few years are starting to help that, not to mention TED talks and similar productions that open up the normality and prevalence of those functioning aspies who have been able to do amazing things.
Given how hugely underdiagnosed autism is I would argue that everyone knows a few people on the spectrum, but unless they screen in schools and expand diagnostic testing then we will never really know how many people have slipped under the radar.
Once diagnosed, it is quite alarming how little support there is! You are told this life-changing news which for many, including myself, triggers an identity crisis and reframing of the self which shouldn't be underestimated to how difficult that is to navigate.
Given the extremely high rates of unemployment amongst aspies as well as the high rates of suicide, I think there is clear evidence that the system is unsupportive.
Working is entirely possible in most cases, but not under the rules and demands of capitalist industry - which many NT people struggle to maintain. If companies offered much more flexibility with regard to working conditions, but also, time. There is full-time, part-time (which is hard to find), or then freelance work. Often unsecured and unprotected positions. After 15 years of doing a mixture of these I can tell you that even the biggest of companies who promote inclusivity really aren't adhering to their PR principles.
MUCH MUCH MORE work needs doing. Government should mandate inclusivity in the workplace and demand alternate working schedules and condition are given, not just require 'appropriate adjustments' to a system setup for an entirely different neurological type is tweaked slightly.
"Adjustments" part got me. 100%. "With adjustments you too can fit this round hole"
"What do you mean you aren't a peg?"
"Adjustments" part got me. 100%. "With adjustments you too can fit this round hole"
"What do you mean you aren't a peg?"
Difference in perspective or difference in method?
You adjust yourself to fit the hole, or, is the hole adjusted to allow you to fit too?
I know which I'd rather but with limited power as an individual this is the issue we face as autists if the NT's in charge of legislating fail to understand us and our needs. :(
Seems mad this even needs to be something we have to ask for though. I think we should just be able to tick a box: Box A) NT schedule Box B) ND schedule. Simple as. No further discourse needed