• Replies 3 replies
  • Subscribers 82 subscribers
  • Views 592 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related
Hints and tips
  • To quote someone's message, first select/highlight the relevant text, and then use the Quote button that appears
  • To "mention" someone, type @ followed by the start of the forum name, and choose from the list; that person will get a notification of being mentioned

Translation to better and worse

Mariusz

I'm not entirely sure how widespread among autistic actualy is lack of the need to divide things and poeple and events among better and worse according to some relative parameter, It often happens that parameter is pushed on everyone by society. Though I'm a bit of a hipocrite in that area since I divide everything between interesting and not. But it's result of necessity not need. Does it make it an excuse?

I came up with a visual representation of my way of seeing things that could possibly breach the Double Empathy gap in that area. It is very much like a clear night sky. Each thing is a dot, and there is no way of telling real distance between two dots. So, it is conceivable that there is no concept of dividing things between farther and closer Or any other category organised that way.

What do you think?

  • in reply to Mariusz

    Some time ago, before I was diagnosed, I came up with an idea how a device called 'keys to the heaven' given to Peter by God to admitt in people found worthy, could look like. A time monocular allowing you to see a life of a person as a sine wave with all criteria spectrums perpendicular to its direction.

    It just ocurred to me what the device does is actuallty allowing user with allistic lenses to see if a person fit in between parameters existing on many spectrums to find out if they're worthy. 

    Imagining the crutch. Except the crutch is for those unable to perceive many spectrums, and trying to simplify things to fit one.

  • in reply to Shardovan

    more or less Stuck out tongue

    I don't see things as existing on linear spectrum

  • Mariusz you have an incredible mind and wonderful way of expressing your thoughts. I will have to come back to your words with a fresher brain in the morning, but I think I grasp the essence of what you’re saying. No universal objective metric (just broad societal consensus, skewed allistically- is that a word?-, of necessity) for good or bad fortune, good or bad personal circumstances, that sort of thing?