That's the problem. They don't meet the criteria - the descriptors used by the WCA, which I presume the tribunal will also use to judge eligibility. Those descriptors are terrible and certainly don't really help my case. So i haven't got a chance and I suspect only very severely affected neurodiverse people will be affected (how such people would cope with a tribunal is another matter entirely).Scorpion0x17 said:If your difficulties do not meet the eligibility crieria, then you, most probably, will not win the appeal.
Don't worry about what diagnosis you may, or may not, have, it is not relevant, it just makes explaining the difficulties easier.
That's the problem. They don't meet the criteria - the descriptors used by the WCA, which I presume the tribunal will also use to judge eligibility. Those descriptors are terrible and certainly don't really help my case. So i haven't got a chance and I suspect only very severely affected neurodiverse people will be affected (how such people would cope with a tribunal is another matter entirely).Scorpion0x17 said:If your difficulties do not meet the eligibility crieria, then you, most probably, will not win the appeal.
Don't worry about what diagnosis you may, or may not, have, it is not relevant, it just makes explaining the difficulties easier.