No, but with evidence you have a stronger case. I don't know your circumstances it may be that your problems were more readily perceptible or credible in some way perhaps. The WCA decides that, because you can talk and walk 'normally' and aren't climbing the walls, that you can handle work. I don't see that changing at a tribunal at all. Especially without a specialist in your condition - hence the need for a diagnosis.Scorpion0x17 said:[quote] it's not about the diagnosis it's about what you are and are not able to do.[/quote]
No, but with evidence you have a stronger case. I don't know your circumstances it may be that your problems were more readily perceptible or credible in some way perhaps. The WCA decides that, because you can talk and walk 'normally' and aren't climbing the walls, that you can handle work. I don't see that changing at a tribunal at all. Especially without a specialist in your condition - hence the need for a diagnosis.Scorpion0x17 said:[quote] it's not about the diagnosis it's about what you are and are not able to do.[/quote]