I think that applying 'yes/no' criteria to autism assessment and diagnosis just indicates that the clinicians carrying out the assessment are, at the very least, uneducated in how autism manifests in different people - it is called a spectrum, for God's sake - or are just incompetent. They note that you make eye contact, and assume that it is the same process as for NT people. I make eye contact, I'm good at it, but I do it consciously and time when to make and break it and the duration, which is soooo not an NT approach. I had a chat with the psychiatrist who did my assessment about how we both loved Monty Python, and I still got a diagnosis. It is time that any clinician given the power of deciding whether or not a person has autism was made to read current research on the condition as a prerequisite for continuing to carry out assessments, and they should be made to pass an exam also.
I completely agree - surely it's verging on negligence to not be using appropriate diagnostic techniques and ignoring the latest research. In some ways it reminds me of when I was in primary school and I broke my arm when I fell off a climbing frame. A teacher didn't believe I was in pain and thought I was just making a fuss so didn't call my parents or do anything about it. It wasn't until I got home and my father (a doctor) looked at my arm that I was taken to the hospital where they did an x-ray and put my arm in a plaster cast (it was a greenstick fracture so not completely broken). When I turned up to school the next day, the teacher was very sheepish indeed! This experience feels a bit like that - someone clearly unqualified to make a diagnosis is insisting they're right, while the trained and experienced professionals use the correct equipment to diagnose what isn't clear from the surface and provide the right treatment.
I completely agree - surely it's verging on negligence to not be using appropriate diagnostic techniques and ignoring the latest research. In some ways it reminds me of when I was in primary school and I broke my arm when I fell off a climbing frame. A teacher didn't believe I was in pain and thought I was just making a fuss so didn't call my parents or do anything about it. It wasn't until I got home and my father (a doctor) looked at my arm that I was taken to the hospital where they did an x-ray and put my arm in a plaster cast (it was a greenstick fracture so not completely broken). When I turned up to school the next day, the teacher was very sheepish indeed! This experience feels a bit like that - someone clearly unqualified to make a diagnosis is insisting they're right, while the trained and experienced professionals use the correct equipment to diagnose what isn't clear from the surface and provide the right treatment.