Is This What Hyperlexia Is

I am wondering whether the following can be regarded as Hyperlexia. When I was around six years old I was told by school that I had the reading age of an eleven year old. I read and read.  However I quickly went downhill at school and came near the bottom of the class but continued reading. It was hard to learn at school. But my mother bought a set of child encyclopaedias. I decided I would read them from beginning to end and remember stuff. I went through all of them. I became obsessed with Greek mythology, did my own chemistry experiments loved electronics and microscopy. I did all this at home. However I was doing so badly at school I was sent to Child Guidance. As a child and teenager I felt and thought I was an inferior retard. I know that word should not be used these days.
In the 90s I was diagnosed as Dyspraxic. I did not know that this was classed as neurodivergent till recently.  However I questioned my diagnosis as I remember that I read so well from an early age and Dyspraxia can be seen as a learning difficulty although I had the other stuff as well. Co-ordination and attention problems. However I have only just been finding out that so many Autistic people have Dyspraxia symptoms and some people are diagnosed Dyspraxic early then Autistic later.  It seems I might have had some autistic traits e.g maybe a form of Alexithymia.  I have read that only 6-14% of people with Autism have Hyperlexia. However 84% of people with Hyperlexia have Autism. When I read about children with Hyperlexia the articles often refer to say three year olds learning to read quickly.  As such I wonder if in my situation would a six year old learning to read like an eleven year older count as Hyperlexia. What do others think as I want to check this stuff.
  • Thanks.  Stringing sentences together in words has always had some difficulties whether writing or speaking. As a child my writing was like a drunken snake!

  • I mean as I understand it hyperlexia isn't really considered a medical condition so its hard to say what the diagnostic criteria should be. I'd say being 5 years ahead for your reading age would have to be a statistically significant gap though. The thing about school is they mostly test your ability to communicate what you've learned not what you've actually learned. If you're bad at expressing yourself in writing you'll do badly on most exams, except maybe maths where, as long as you show your working, you should be ok if you actually understand what's going on.

    A love of reading doesn't actually mean you're automatically good at forming easy to follow sentences. I often think oral exams might be better for students doing essay style questions because the examiner can stop the student and tell them that the meaning of their answer isn't clear.

  • I could read before I went to school and never had to read the same “learning to read books” as the other children. I think they got me books from the primary school around the corner. In primary school I was always a “free reader” I could choose books off the shelf and I read Ronald Dahl and Enid blyton at home. All went a bit downhill in secondary school, stopped reading so much, nearly failed my English GCSE! and now I really struggle to absorb what I’m reading. I would only read now if I was really bored and had literally nothing else to do. I can struggle with understimulation I’m better focused if I can engage more than one sense (TV, computer games , online lectures for work instead of reading textbooks etc) which wasn’t so easily done in the 90s! Maybe that’s why I read more as a child