Job interview and Occupational Health interview today

I have another job interview this morning, at the place I worked before I took my current job.  I enjoyed working there, not least because I could walk to work (just over a mile from home), and only left because I took on the role of full-time carer for my mother during her final illness.  It's the first non-direct care role I've had an interview for for several years.  It's a care charity, but this is an office role.  They asked for experience in care and admin work, which is why I was short-listed - though my last pure office role was in 2004, so I may be a little rusty with the programs they require familiarity with: Excel and Outlook.  I guess I could soon bone up on both.

If I'm offered it, I'll have a difficult choice to make.  Before Christmas, I was offered another role as Learning Support with PMLD at a local FE college.  I've got that in the bag.  But with two offers, I'll have to give serious consideration to the pros and cons of each - and they kind of out-balance one another.

The College is term-time only, so gives long holidays (two months in summer).  But it's more traveling, and there's more difficulty with parking as there's none on-site.  It'll mean trawling back-streets for a space, and probably a 15-minute walk from there.  Bottom line is, I'll have to keep the car, with attendant running costs, and it'll make for a longer day (an hour, or slightly more).  The College is also front-line work with PMLD, so feeding, personal care... but I don't mind that, and it can be very rewarding work.

The other place is a charity, and they do great work.  It'll be the usual 9 - 5 routine that I like (the College is 8.30 - 4, so pretty much the same), but 28 days a year annual leave against the College's 14 weeks.  It's office work, too.  I used to enjoy that, to be fair, as long as I was left to get on with my work and didn't have to engage in the other stuff: small talk, banter, office politics.  I'm not sure how I feel about returning to a sedentary occupation, too.  I'm sure I'll be good at the work.  But I doubt it'll give the same level of satisfaction.  On the other hand, it might be good to give direct care work a rest.  I suppose I'll get a better idea after today.  And I might not be offered it anyway, in which case it won't matter.

Basically, if I get both offers, it'll come down to: more cost and hassle with traveling with the College, but lots of time off in a more rewarding job; or cost-free walking to work at a place I like, but back in an office (even though the work will be care-associated).  I'll also get free lunches at the place today - cooked on-site.  In both, the money is the same - though at the College, that'll be for 38 weeks instead of 52, so I'll actually be getting paid a higher hourly rate for the role.  About time I had a care role that paid a salary more commensurate with the responsibility involved with the job!

I have a DBS already for the College job, so could pretty much start straight away.  I'd have to wait for one for today's job - up to 12 weeks.  I can't see myself returning to my current job, so it could be a long wait on UC.  My sick note runs out on 2nd Jan, after which I get zero sick pay.  I'll either have to leave through ill-health, or just renew my note and play it out until they let me go.

I also have Occupational Health ringing me later this afternoon to check in and see what they can offer.  Don't really know what to tell them - except I don't feel like going back just yet.  Although I suppose that at least knowing I have a new job to go to means I can return a little safer in the knowledge that it's only short-term.  I spoke to my Employment Support Adviser at The Shaw Trust about the issue, and he reckons just stay off sick.  Why take the chance of going back to more passive-aggression - even if the end is in sight? 

Stuff to think on.

I'm terrible at decision-making.  Why do I have to wait for ages, then get two interviews at once?  Always the way it goes...

  • Former Member
    Former Member in reply to Martian Tom

    No.  I mean it's obvious you're not going to change the perspectives at that place, so trying will just be tilting at windmills.  If that will make you happy then have at it, but personally I wouldn't waste my effort trying to change opinions of people who no longer need to be part of my life.

  • You mean like the usual battles we NDs face out there in the world?

    In other words... give up on ever trying to win.

    Is it any wonder so many of us die so young, and at our own hands?

  • Well, that's interesting.

    I've just found out from a colleague who's in the know about my situation that the woman in question is now openly bullying someone else - calling her 'a fat c**t', etc, and saying she 'doesn't give a f**k' if people report her for it.

    I hope they all go forwards and complain.  Somehow, though, I think people will end up wanting to protect their own backs.

    I'm trying to encourage them all, and the latest victim (a lovely woman - I can't believe she's been targetted) to report it.

    I hope they do.  The sooner they realise they have a cancerous personality in their midst, the sooner they can do something about it.

    If they've a mind to...

  • Former Member
    Former Member in reply to Martian Tom

    I'd suggest your energy is better spent on battles that you stand a chance of winning.

  • No, there isn't.  But the injustice of it is hard to forget.  When you find something like this out - that they're actually trying that tack (and the woman I spoke to actually agreed with me that it sounds highly suspicious, like they might be trying a ploy for constructive dismissal), then you don't just roll over and forget it.

    Either we let them continue trying to exploit us, or we take up the cudgels in some way.

    No.  I can't let it go.  That's what they want me to do.

  • Mods: the omission of certain letters is surely enough, isn't it?  Are we all children? 

    Maybe I should have just said fecking bustards.

  • Former Member
    Former Member in reply to Martian Tom

    You've already decided to move on, you've found something else, they'll probably be glad to see you go since they now perceive you as a problem - just let it go if you can.  There's no point getting wound about it now.

  • I think that's certainly the case.  It's a charity, so resources are tight - and that usually means more work being distributed between fewer staff.

  • I wonder what the NAS would have to say about it.

    I think you'll find that NAS will be rather silent....

  • Yes.  I said to her that there's a chasm of difference between clients using challenging behaviour as a form of communication and someone being deliberately challenging as part of a bullying campaign.

    I left the Union because I was appalled at how little seemed to be the help they were offering.  Maybe I should have stayed in.  Not that I really want to get into a protracted dispute, especially with a charity.

    All the same, though... I think this needs to be looked into.  I wonder what the NAS would have to say about it.

    Three words that keep coming into my head: devious f****** b*******!

    [Edited by Moderator]

  • But the Occupational Health person recognises that they are on thin ice... I agree with her.. challenging clients are one things.... staff a different matter

  • The OC woman said that she will compile a report and send it to me first, before it goes to my managers, for my agreement.  She said she's going to stipulate that she doesn't believe they're supporting me enough in accordance with my needs, and will quote the Equality Act and the Disability Act... and she will tell them that they really need to find out more about the condition they're meant to be in the business of dealing with.

    Hold on to the above Mr T and keep reading it..

    For every *** in the world....there is also someone who has your back....

  • No... I think she was being honestly realistic.  It's good to know the situation.  I could tell how under stress she was.  During the interview, she had to leave at one point to deal with an emergency.  When she came back, she said 'This happens a lot.  Sorry.'

    How about the fact that my current lot are suggesting I'm not dealing with challenging behaviour properly?  I still can't believe they'd be that bloody crafty.

  • Do you think she was trying just to put you off... or what she trying trying to realistic?

  • Whoa!  Just got off the phone from the Occy Health woman.  She was great, actually, with a good understanding about Asperger's.

    She told me something that sent my blood pressure up.

    In spite of all I've told them at work about my condition and how it affects me, and notwithstanding the fact that they specialise in autism... the message they sent to OC was that they wanted us to have a talk so a suitable way forwards could be figured out.  She said that, from the tone of the message she received, it seemed to her that they aren't sure what to do for the best.  She said, though, that they'd also sent her a copy of my job description, highlighting that part of my job role was 'dealing with challenging behaviour.'

    You can probably imagine my reaction to that.  She agreed with me, too.  'I don't know why they said that,' she said.  'Unless they don't really have a proper understanding of autism.  You can deal with challenging behaviour from service users.  But it's a world of difference from dealing with bullying and harassment from a work colleague.'

    Exactly!  And the first thought that came into my head?  That they're trying to build a case against me on the grounds that I can't fulfill an important aspect of my job role.

    I really can't believe they could do something like this.  Or maybe I can.  I'm a liability to them now.  A problem that needs to be dealt with quickly, and move on.

    The OC woman said that she will compile a report and send it to me first, before it goes to my managers, for my agreement.  She said she's going to stipulate that she doesn't believe they're supporting me enough in accordance with my needs, and will quote the Equality Act and the Disability Act... and she will tell them that they really need to find out more about the condition they're meant to be in the business of dealing with.

    I'm still shaking with fury now.

  • That's great - you can opt for the college with no regrets - the job you were interviewed for today sounds horribly stressful! 

    Hope all goes OK with Occ Health. 

    ()

  • Former Member
    Former Member in reply to Martian Tom

    Sounds like a wise decision!  TBH, even if you were up-to-speed before you started I think what she described would get tiring quite quickly.  It sounds as if they basically want their staff to be at their constant beck and call.  It sounds like they are under resourced, which gets to people, so they take off a lot time sick to get some downtime, which increases the pressure on the remaining people, who end up needing time off to...

    Hopefully the school will be a bit more regimented and at least you get some big chunks of downtime to recharge.

  • Thanks for your good luck wishes, Sunflower and Ellie.

    I think I have my answer.

    I was interviewed by two very nice and personable, but very honest and stressed-out women - one of whom would be my manager.  She made no bones about the huge stresses of the job, the constantly shifting priorities, the innumerable variables.

    I said to her it sounded like she needed someone to hit the ground running.

    'I'm not even sure what the ground is,' she replied.  She then gave me a long litany of things that can go wrong that could throw the most important part of her job - the rota for the entire staff in the house - into a nose-dive.  She told me there was enormous pressure, and just as a job seemed completed, something usually came up to mean it would need to be done again: medication not arriving, surprise appointments, booking transport that then became unavailable on the day, staff going sick at a moment's notice, senior managers demanding stuff, constant complaints about things that they had no control over.

    'Some days, I suddenly realise just before hometime that I haven't had any lunch.  Some days, I boil the kettle all day and never get to make a cup of tea.'

    She said there were often sudden emergencies where staff would be called in from home in the evenings to rejig the rota, or rearrange services.  The extra time could be taken as time off - when any spare time became available.

    'It's called an admin job... but it's not a normal office job.  There's so much more to do.'

    I think it would be fine if I could learn it all before fitting into the role.  But in those circumstances - and for minimum wage - I think I'd be heading for crack-up very quickly.

    The College it is, then.